From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Mesa

U.S.
May 5, 1913
228 U.S. 533 (1913)

Opinion

ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS.

No. 864.

Argued April 11, 1913. Decided May 5, 1913.

Decided on authority of preceding case. 199 F. 518, reversed.

THE facts are stated in the opinion.

Mr. Assistant Attorney General Adkins, with whom Mr. Karl W. Kirchwey was on the brief, for the United States.

No appearance for defendant in error.


The defendant in error was indicted upon the charge that within the jurisdiction of the court he "did unlawfully, knowingly, wilfully and with intent to export the munitions of war hereinafter described from the said city of El Paso to Ciudad Juarez, in Mexico, make a certain shipment of certain munitions of war, to-wit: three thousand (3,000) Winchester rifle cartridges of the calibre 44; that is to say, did make a shipment of said munitions of war from said city of El Paso and with said Ciudad Juarez, in Mexico, as the destination of said shipment, by transporting the same in a wagon from a point," etc.

A demurrer to the indictment was heard along with the demurrer to the indictment in the case against Chavez, which we have just decided. The demurrer was sustained and the indictment quashed upon the opinion rendered in the Chavez Case. The ruling which we have just made in that case is therefore applicable to this and necessitates a reversal.

Judgment reversed.


Summaries of

United States v. Mesa

U.S.
May 5, 1913
228 U.S. 533 (1913)
Case details for

United States v. Mesa

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES v . MESA

Court:U.S.

Date published: May 5, 1913

Citations

228 U.S. 533 (1913)

Citing Cases

U.S. v. Curtiss-Wright Corp.

No one of them involved a determination of a condition upon the happening of which a law not yet in effect…

United States v. Simpson

The introduction could be effected only through transportation, and whether this took one form or another it…