From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Meeks

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. Unit A
Feb 10, 1981
642 F.2d 732 (5th Cir. 1981)

Opinion

No. 80-2370.

February 10, 1981.

Ronald P. Guyer, San Antonio, Tex., for defendant-appellant.

Michael L. Paup, Charles E. Brookhart, Richard N. Bush, Attys., M. Carr Ferguson, Asst. Atty. Gen., Chief, Tax Division, U.S. Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., for plaintiffs-appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas; Dorwin W. Suttle.

Before CHARLES CLARK, REAVLEY, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.


The order adjudging appellant George W. Meeks in contempt of court for failure to produce records of the St. George Corporation or to explain why he cannot produce them, and ordering his confinement until he purges himself of contempt is VACATED.

Vacating this order does not bar proceedings undertaken to determine if appellant should be adjudged guilty of criminal contempt and confined for a fixed term for failure to obey the order of the court to produce the records. Any finding of contempt, however, cannot be grounded upon an assertion of the privilege against self-incrimination by Meeks when asked to explain why he cannot now produce such records.

Full opinion will be submitted later. Judge Reavley dissents.

ORDER VACATED.

Opinion issued, 5th Cir., 642 F.2d 733.


Summaries of

United States v. Meeks

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. Unit A
Feb 10, 1981
642 F.2d 732 (5th Cir. 1981)
Case details for

United States v. Meeks

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND ALBERT RODRIGUEZ, JR., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLEES…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. Unit A

Date published: Feb 10, 1981

Citations

642 F.2d 732 (5th Cir. 1981)

Citing Cases

United States v. Meeks

JERRE S. WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge: On February 10, 1981, 642 F.2d 732, this Court vacated an order of the…

United States v. Meeks

His confinement was ordered until he purged himself of the contempt by complying with the summons or…