From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Medina-Prado

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 23, 2012
Case No.: 10-411 LKK (E.D. Cal. Jan. 23, 2012)

Opinion

Case No.: 10-411 LKK

01-23-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ALEJANDRO MEDINA-PRADO, Defendant.

CLEMENTE M. JIMENÉZ, SBN 207136 Attorney for Defendant ALEJANDRO MEDINA-PRADO


CLEMENTE M. JIMENÉZ, SBN 207136

Attorney for Defendant

ALEJANDRO MEDINA-PRADO

STIPULATION AND ORDER VACATING DATE, CONTINUING CASE, AND EXCLUDING TIME


DATE: January 24, 2012

JUDGE: Hon. Lawrence K. Karlton

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Assistant United States Attorney Paul Hemesath, Counsel for Plaintiff, and Attorney Clemente M. Jimenez, Counsel for Defendant ALEJANDRO MEDINA-PRADO, that the status conference scheduled for January 24, 2012, at 9:15 a.m., be vacated and the matter continued to this Court's criminal calendar on February 14, 2012, at 9:15 a.m. for further status conference. Defense counsel has just been presented with a plea agreement, which needs to be reviewed with Mr. Medina-Prado, currently housed in Butte County.

IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED that time for trial under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. Section 3161 et seq. be tolled pursuant to Section 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv), (Local code T-4), and that the ends of justice served in granting the continuance and allowing the defendants further time to prepare outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant to a speedy trial.

___________________________

PAUL HEMESATH

Attorney for Plaintiff

___________________________

CLEMENTE M. JIMENÉZ

Attorney for Alejandro Medina-Prado

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED, that the status conference in the above-entitled matter, scheduled for January 24, 2012, at 9:15 a.m., be vacated and the matter continued to February 14, 2012, at 9:15 a.m. for change of plea. The Court finds that time under the Speedy Trial Act shall be excluded through that date in order to afford counsel reasonable time to prepare. Based on the parties' representations, the Court finds that the ends of justice served by granting a continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendants to a speedy trial.

___________________________

LAWRENCE K. KARLTON

SENIOR JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT


Summaries of

United States v. Medina-Prado

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 23, 2012
Case No.: 10-411 LKK (E.D. Cal. Jan. 23, 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Medina-Prado

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ALEJANDRO MEDINA-PRADO, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 23, 2012

Citations

Case No.: 10-411 LKK (E.D. Cal. Jan. 23, 2012)