From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Mauro

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Sep 5, 1968
399 F.2d 158 (2d Cir. 1968)

Opinion

No. 10, Docket 32255.

Argued September 5, 1968.

Decided September 5, 1968.

Appeal from an order of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, Thomas F. Croake, J., denying petitioner's motion, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255, to vacate the judgment of his conviction for violation of the narcotics laws.

Irving Anolik, New York City (Michael P. Direnzo, New York City, on the brief), for appellant.

Arthur A. Munisteri, Asst. U.S. Atty. (Robert M. Morgenthau, U.S. Atty. for Southern District of New York, Leonard M. Marks, Asst. U.S. Atty., on the brief), for appellee.

Before LUMBARD, Chief Judge, and ANDERSON and SMITH, Circuit Judges.


We affirm in open court the judgment of the district court which denied Mauro's motion to vacate, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255, the judgment of his conviction for violation of the narcotics laws, substantially for the reasons stated in Judge Croake's opinion reported, sub nom. United States v. Caruso et al., D.C., 280 F. Supp. 371 (1967).


Summaries of

United States v. Mauro

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Sep 5, 1968
399 F.2d 158 (2d Cir. 1968)
Case details for

United States v. Mauro

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Vincent MAURO, Appellant

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit

Date published: Sep 5, 1968

Citations

399 F.2d 158 (2d Cir. 1968)

Citing Cases

United States v. Welton

Judge Bruchhausen, without holding a hearing, denied the motion on May 14, 1970, and subsequently filed a…

United States ex Rel. Leeson v. Damon

The disappointment of an expectation fostered by an attorney's inadvertence in advising or failing to advise…