From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Maguire

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT District of Maine
Apr 3, 2012
No. 2:11-cr-149-GZS (D. Me. Apr. 3, 2012)

Opinion

No. 2:11-cr-149-GZS

04-03-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff v. SEAMUS MAGUIRE, Defendant


ORDER AFFIRMING THE

RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The United States Magistrate Judge filed with the Court on February 13, 2012, his Recommended Decision (Docket No. 48). Defendant filed his Objection to the Recommended Decision (Docket No. 49) on February 15, 2012. The Government filed its Response to Defendant's Objection to the Recommended Decision (Docket No. 50) on February 21, 2012.

I have reviewed and considered the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision, together with the entire record; I have made a de novo determination of all matters adjudicated by the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision; and I concur with the recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge for the reasons set forth in his Recommended Decision, and determine that no further proceeding is necessary.

1. It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate Judge is hereby AFFIRMED.
2. It is hereby ORDERED that Defendant's Motion to Suppress (Docket No. 27) is DENIED.

George Z. Singal

U.S. District Judge


Summaries of

United States v. Maguire

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT District of Maine
Apr 3, 2012
No. 2:11-cr-149-GZS (D. Me. Apr. 3, 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Maguire

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff v. SEAMUS MAGUIRE, Defendant

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT District of Maine

Date published: Apr 3, 2012

Citations

No. 2:11-cr-149-GZS (D. Me. Apr. 3, 2012)

Citing Cases

United States v. Lemay

In such cases, it logically and necessarily follows that the officer may reasonably conclude the suspect may…