From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Macias

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jul 8, 1975
519 F.2d 697 (9th Cir. 1975)

Opinion

No. 74-2711.

July 8, 1975.

Richard L. Rosenfield (argued), Los Angeles, Cal., for defendant-appellant.

Darrell W. MacIntyre, Asst. U.S. Atty. (argued), Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiff-appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California.

Before BARNES, WRIGHT and WALLACE, Circuit Judges.


ORDER

It appearing to this Court that appellant has fled jurisdiction of the district court after perfecting appeal, and his bond has been forfeited, this appeal must be dismissed as both frivolous and moot. ( See United States v. Dawson, 350 F.2d 396 (6th Cir. 1965); Brinlee v. United States, 483 F.2d 925 (8th Cir. 1973); United States v. Shelton, 482 F.2d 848 (5th Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 1075, 94 S.Ct. 591, 38 L.Ed.2d 482 (1973); Johnson v. Laird, 432 F.2d 77, 78 (9th Cir. 1970).) Unless appellant submits himself to the jurisdiction of the district court within 30 days from the date of this order, the dismissal of this appeal shall be deemed final and no motion for reinstatement shall be entertainable. See United States v. Shelton, 508 F.2d 797 (5th Cir. 1975); and compare Johnson v. Laird, 435 F.2d 493, 495 (9th Cir. 1970).

Appeal dismissed.


Summaries of

United States v. Macias

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jul 8, 1975
519 F.2d 697 (9th Cir. 1975)
Case details for

United States v. Macias

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. DANNY A. MACIAS…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Jul 8, 1975

Citations

519 F.2d 697 (9th Cir. 1975)

Citing Cases

U.S. v. Sudthisa-Ard

We have invoked this "disentitlement doctrine" on numerous occasions. See, e.g., United States v. Freelove,…

U.S. v. Freelove

One may not invoke the power of judicial review only thereafter to obey or disobey the lower court's mandate…