From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Littlejohn

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Aug 25, 2020
No. 20-6205 (4th Cir. Aug. 25, 2020)

Opinion

No. 20-6205

08-25-2020

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. THOMAS FLOYD LITTLEJOHN, Defendant - Appellant.

Thomas Floyd Littlejohn, Appellant Pro Se.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Martin K. Reidinger, Chief District Judge. (1:90-cr-00231-MR-WCM-5) Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, WYNN, and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges. Vacated and remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion. Thomas Floyd Littlejohn, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Thomas Floyd Littlejohn appeals the district court's January 17, 2020, order finding that Littlejohn was ineligible for a sentence reduction under the First Step Act of 2018, Pub. L. No. 115-391, 132 Stat. 5194 ("FSA"). Since then, and while this appeal has been pending, this court published two opinions that have bearing on the district court's dispositive rationale: United States v. Chambers, 956 F.3d 667, 668 (4th Cir. 2020) (holding that "any Guidelines error deemed retroactive . . . must be corrected in a First Step Act resentencing"), and United States v. Gravatt, 953 F.3d 258, 263-64 (4th Cir. 2020) (holding that a defendant is convicted of a "'covered offense'" under the FSA "where he was charged conjunctively with conspiring to distribute both powder cocaine and crack cocaine"). Upon review of the arguments pressed on appeal, and in light of our recent decisions, we vacate the district court's order and remand this case to the district court for further proceedings consistent with Chambers and Gravatt. We express no opinion as to how the district court should resolve the involved issues. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

VACATED AND REMANDED


Summaries of

United States v. Littlejohn

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Aug 25, 2020
No. 20-6205 (4th Cir. Aug. 25, 2020)
Case details for

United States v. Littlejohn

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. THOMAS FLOYD…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Aug 25, 2020

Citations

No. 20-6205 (4th Cir. Aug. 25, 2020)

Citing Cases

United States v. Littlejohn

In his briefing on appeal, the Defendant argued that his career offender enhancement was erroneous in light…