From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Kenner

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Dec 23, 1974
508 F.2d 409 (4th Cir. 1974)

Opinion

No. 74-1534.

Submitted November 25, 1974.

Decided December 23, 1974. Certiorari Denied April 14, 1975.

William A. Cosby, Jr., Richmond, Va., on brief for appellant.

Brian P. Gettings, U.S. Atty., and Charles L. Beard, Asst. U.S. Atty., on brief for appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia.

Before RUSSELL, FIELD and WIDENER, Circuit Judges.


Aaron Harold Kenner was convicted of violating 18 U.S.C. App. § 1202(a)(1), which provides criminal penalties for any person who has been convicted of a felony ". . . and who receives, possesses, or transports in commerce or affecting commerce . . . any firearm . . ." On appeal, Kenner does not challenge that he has a valid previous felony conviction, that he had possession of a firearm, or that the government's proof established that the firearm in question had traveled in interstate commerce at some point in time before he possessed it. Kenner asserts, however, that the government offered no proof connecting his possession of the weapon with its interstate transportation. It is also argued the statute is unconstitutional if construed to permit a conviction upon a mere showing that a firearm had, at some undetermined point, traveled in interstate commerce before being possessed by a convicted felon.

We have expressed our view on numerous recent occasions that in a prosecution for violation of 18 U.S.C. App. § 1202(a), the government need not establish a nexus between the receipt or possession of a weapon and its movement in interstate commerce. E. g., United States v. Davis (4th Cir. 1974), 498 F.2d 1398; United States v. Jordan (4th Cir. 1974), 502 F.2d 1163; United States v. Mullins (4th Cir. 1973), 476 F.2d 664, cert. denied 414 U.S. 839, 94 S.Ct. 91, 38 L.Ed.2d 75 (1973). We also reiterate our view that the statute is constitutional. United States v. Cabbler (4th Cir. 1970), 429 F.2d 577, cert. denied, 400 U.S. 901, 91 S.Ct. 138, 27 L.Ed.2d 138 (1970).

Accordingly, we dispense with oral argument and affirm.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

United States v. Kenner

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Dec 23, 1974
508 F.2d 409 (4th Cir. 1974)
Case details for

United States v. Kenner

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLEE v. AARON HAROLD KENNER, APPELLANT

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Dec 23, 1974

Citations

508 F.2d 409 (4th Cir. 1974)

Citing Cases

United States v. Malone

Some cases support my position. See, e. g., United States v. Kenner, 508 F.2d 409 (4 Cir. 1974), cert.…

United States v. Bell

The case illustrates the necessity of establishing a close and contemporaneous interstate nexus in a…