From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Kay

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Jul 22, 2016
655 F. App'x 165 (4th Cir. 2016)

Opinion

No. 16-6338

07-22-2016

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. JOSEPH LEON KAY, Defendant - Appellant.

Joseph Leon Kay, Appellant Pro Se. Gary L. Call, Steven Loew, Assistant United States Attorneys, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.


UNPUBLISHED Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Parkersburg. Thomas E. Johnston, District Judge. (6:09-cr-00252-1) Before SHEDD, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Joseph Leon Kay, Appellant Pro Se. Gary L. Call, Steven Loew, Assistant United States Attorneys, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Joseph Leon Kay appeals the district court's order denying his motion for a sentence reduction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Kay, No. 6:09-cr-00252-1 (S.D.W. Va. Feb. 18, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

United States v. Kay

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Jul 22, 2016
655 F. App'x 165 (4th Cir. 2016)
Case details for

United States v. Kay

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. JOSEPH LEON KAY…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Jul 22, 2016

Citations

655 F. App'x 165 (4th Cir. 2016)

Citing Cases

United States v. Ramirez

Our holding that there is no ex post facto violation in applying Amendment 759 to limit sentence reductions…