From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Kaplansky

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Nov 29, 1993
5 F.3d 177 (6th Cir. 1993)

Opinion

No. 92-3744.

November 29, 1993.

Before: MERRITT, Chief Judge, KEITH, KENNEDY, MARTIN, JONES, MILBURN, GUY, NELSON, RYAN, BOGGS, NORRIS, SUHRHEINRICH, SILER and BATCHELDER, Circuit Judges.


ORDER

A majority of the Judges of this Court in regular active service have voted for rehearing of this case en banc. Sixth Circuit Rule 14 provides as follows:

The effect of the granting of a hearing en banc shall be to vacate the previous opinion and judgment of this court, to stay the mandate and to restore the case on the docket sheet as a pending appeal.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the previous decision and judgment of this court is vacated, the mandate is stayed and this case is restored to the docket as a pending appeal.

The Clerk will direct the parties to file supplemental briefs and will schedule this case for oral argument as soon as possible.


Summaries of

United States v. Kaplansky

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Nov 29, 1993
5 F.3d 177 (6th Cir. 1993)
Case details for

United States v. Kaplansky

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. ROBERT PAUL KAPLANSKY…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit

Date published: Nov 29, 1993

Citations

5 F.3d 177 (6th Cir. 1993)

Citing Cases

U.S. v. Mack

We decide whether a crime is a "violent felony" based on the statutory definition of the crime, not the…

U.S. v. Mack

United States v. Mack, 8 F.3d 1109 (6th Cir. 1993) (per curiam). The government filed a petition for…