From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Joy

United States District Court, Northern District of Alabama
Jan 22, 2024
7:23-cr-00225-LSC-NAD-1 (N.D. Ala. Jan. 22, 2024)

Opinion

7:23-cr-00225-LSC-NAD-1

01-22-2024

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ISIAH TEANTHONY JOY, Defendant.


MEMORANDUM OF OPINION AND ORDER

L. SCOTT COOGLER, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

The defendant has filed a motion to dismiss the indictment. (Doc. 19.) The motion has been briefed by the parties. (Docs. 21, 26, 27.) The magistrate judge filed a report and recommendation, recommending that the motion be denied. (Doc. 33.) The defendant has objected. (Doc. 36.)

Having now carefully reviewed and considered de novo all the materials in the court file, including the report and recommendation and the objection thereto, the Court is of the opinion that the report is due to be and hereby is ADOPTED, the recommendation is ACCEPTED. Consequently, the motion to dismiss the indictment (doc. 19) is hereby DENIED.

DONE and ORDERED.


Summaries of

United States v. Joy

United States District Court, Northern District of Alabama
Jan 22, 2024
7:23-cr-00225-LSC-NAD-1 (N.D. Ala. Jan. 22, 2024)
Case details for

United States v. Joy

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ISIAH TEANTHONY JOY, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of Alabama

Date published: Jan 22, 2024

Citations

7:23-cr-00225-LSC-NAD-1 (N.D. Ala. Jan. 22, 2024)

Citing Cases

United States v. Broaden

McMillan is welcome to press his claim that Rozier warrants revisiting on appeal. Because the court is bound…