From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Isaac

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Sep 25, 1972
466 F.2d 502 (5th Cir. 1972)

Opinion

No. 72-1563. Summary Calendar.

Rule 18, 5th Cir. See Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. of New York et al., 5th Cir. 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part I.

September 25, 1972.

Philip S. Brooks, New Orleans, La., court-appointed, for defendant-appellant.

Gerald J. Gallinghouse, U.S. Atty., Patrick C. McGinity, Mary Williams Cazalas, Asst. U.S. Attys., New Orleans, La., for plaintiff-appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana.

Before GEWIN, AINSWORTH and SIMPSON, Circuit Judges.



The appellant Isaac was found guilty by a jury of knowingly and intentionally distributing approximately 11.65 grams of heroin in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). He contends that the judgment of conviction should be reversed because he was entrapped by undercover agents and would not have sold or distributed the heroin except for such entrapment. We affirm.

The evidence with respect to the issue of entrapment was fully developed during the course of the trial and was submitted to the jury under proper instructions of the court. There was ample evidence to support the verdict and judgment of guilt. See Sorrells v. United States, 287 U.S. 435, 53 S.Ct. 210, 77 L.Ed. 413 (1932); United States v. Villafana, 455 F.2d 478 (5th Cir. 1972); United States v. Virciglio, 441 F.2d 1295 (5th Cir. 1971); Pierce v. United States, 414 F.2d 163 (5th Cir. 1969).

Judgment affirmed.


Summaries of

United States v. Isaac

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Sep 25, 1972
466 F.2d 502 (5th Cir. 1972)
Case details for

United States v. Isaac

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. REGGIE ISAAC…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit

Date published: Sep 25, 1972

Citations

466 F.2d 502 (5th Cir. 1972)

Citing Cases

United States v. Mahoney

It is noteworthy that both Williamson and Bueno are relied on by numerous Ninth Circuit government misconduct…