From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Horton

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
Sep 20, 2011
Case No. 3:03cr157 (S.D. Ohio Sep. 20, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. 3:03cr157 Case No. 3:08cv133

09-20-2011

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL D. HORTON, Defendant.


JUDGE WALTER HERBERT RICE


DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE (DOC. #123) IN THEIR ENTIRETY; DEFENDANT'S OBJECTIONS TO SAID JUDICIAL FILING (DOC. #124) OVERRULED; JUDGMENT TO ENTER IN FAVOR OF GOVERNMENT AND AGAINST DEFENDANT HEREIN OVERRULING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO VACATE OR SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT, PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 60(b)(5) AND (6); ANTICIPATED REQUEST FOR CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY AND MOTION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL IN FORMA PAUPERIS DENIED; TERMINATION ENTRY

Pursuant to the reasoning and citations of authority set forth by the United States Magistrate Judge, in his Report and Recommendations, filed May 12, 2011 (Doc. #123), as well as upon a thorough de novo review of this Court's file and the applicable law, this Court adopts said Report and Recommendations in their entirety. The Defendant's Objections to said judicial filing (Doc. #124) are overruled.

As requested by the Defendant in his pro se Petition to present supplemental authority (Doc. #125), this Court has reviewed the case of Lafferty v. District of Columbia, 277 F.2d 348 (D.C. Cir. 1960), and finds same to be inapposite as controlling authority. In Lafferty, based upon the specific and somewhat unique facts therein, the Court permitted petitioner to challenge a decree adjudging that he was of unsound mind, in the face of the challenge that laches on his part should prevent his doing so.

Pursuant to the above, this Court overrules the Defendant's Motion to Vacate or set aside judgment previously rendered in this case, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(5) and (6) (Doc. #122).

Given that jurists of reason would not disagree with this Court's opinion rendered herein and, further, given that any appeal from this Court's decision would be objectively frivolous, this Court denies both the Defendant a certificate of appealability and any anticipated motion for leave to appeal in forma pauperis.

The captioned cause is hereby ordered terminated upon the docket records of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio, Western Division, at Dayton.

WALTER HERBERT RICE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Copies to: Michael D. Horton, Pro Se
Counsel of record


Summaries of

United States v. Horton

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
Sep 20, 2011
Case No. 3:03cr157 (S.D. Ohio Sep. 20, 2011)
Case details for

United States v. Horton

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL D. HORTON, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON

Date published: Sep 20, 2011

Citations

Case No. 3:03cr157 (S.D. Ohio Sep. 20, 2011)