From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Holley

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION
May 28, 2014
CASE NO. 4:12CR29 (E.D. Tex. May. 28, 2014)

Opinion

CASE NO. 4:12CR29

05-28-2014

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. JAMES CECIL HOLLEY, JR. (1)


MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action, this matter having been heretofore referred to the United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §636. On May 21, 2014, the report of the Magistrate Judge was entered containing proposed findings of fact and recommendations that Defendant's Motion to Suppress (With Warrant) - No. 3 (Dkt. 85) be DENIED.

The court, having made a de novo review of the objections raised by Defendant, is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct, and the objections of Defendant are without merit. Therefore, the court hereby adopts the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge as the findings and conclusions of this court. It is, therefore, ORDERED that Defendant's Motion to Suppress (With Warrant) - No. 3 (Dkt. 85) is DENIED.

The parties agreed to shorten the time period to object to the report.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

__________

RICHARD A. SCHELL

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Holley

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION
May 28, 2014
CASE NO. 4:12CR29 (E.D. Tex. May. 28, 2014)
Case details for

United States v. Holley

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. JAMES CECIL HOLLEY, JR. (1)

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION

Date published: May 28, 2014

Citations

CASE NO. 4:12CR29 (E.D. Tex. May. 28, 2014)