From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Hinson

United States District Court, S.D. Florida
Jan 13, 1925
3 F.2d 200 (S.D. Fla. 1925)

Opinion

No. 2176.

January 13, 1925.

W.M. Gober, U.S. Atty., of Tampa, Fla., and Maynard Ramsey, Asst. U.S. Atty., of Jacksonville, Fla.

A.G. Hartridge and Richard Stillman, both of Jacksonville, Fla., for defendants.


Criminal prosecution by the United States against Joe Hinson and Luella Hinson. On demurrer to plea in abatement. Demurrer sustained.


At common law it is probable that the plea of coverture would state a cause of abatement, on account of the unity of husband and wife; the husband being the responsible party for joint crimes committed by husband and wife. And this rule would prevail in states adopting the common law and having made no change by statute. As I understand it, there is no common law prevailing in the United States, and since the adoption of the Nineteenth Amendment to the Constitution, it seems to me that the rule of common law has no application to crimes committed against the United States.

The demurrer to the said plea will therefore be sustained.


Summaries of

United States v. Hinson

United States District Court, S.D. Florida
Jan 13, 1925
3 F.2d 200 (S.D. Fla. 1925)
Case details for

United States v. Hinson

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES v. HINSON et ux

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Florida

Date published: Jan 13, 1925

Citations

3 F.2d 200 (S.D. Fla. 1925)

Citing Cases

United States v. Anthony

" To which we add United States v. DeQuilfeldt, C.C.W.D.Tenn. 1881, 5 F. 276, at page 278, the "* * * defence…

Haning v. United States

King v. City of Owensboro, 187 Ky. 21, 218 S.W. 297; Morton v. State, 141 Tenn. 357, 209 S.W. 644, 4 A.L.R.…