From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Haymond

Supreme Court of the United States
Oct 26, 2018
139 S. Ct. 398 (2018)

Summary

In Haymond, the Supreme Court held that a revocation of supervised release and imposition of a mandatory minimum sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3583(k), based on judge-made findings by a preponderance of the evidence, violated due process and the right to a trial by jury. United States v. Haymond, 139 S. Ct. 2369, 2378-83 (2019).

Summary of this case from United States v. Aguirre

Opinion

No. 17–1672.

10-26-2018

UNITED STATES, petitioner, v. Andre Ralph HAYMOND.


Motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Petition for writ of certiorari granted.


Summaries of

United States v. Haymond

Supreme Court of the United States
Oct 26, 2018
139 S. Ct. 398 (2018)

In Haymond, the Supreme Court held that a revocation of supervised release and imposition of a mandatory minimum sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3583(k), based on judge-made findings by a preponderance of the evidence, violated due process and the right to a trial by jury. United States v. Haymond, 139 S. Ct. 2369, 2378-83 (2019).

Summary of this case from United States v. Aguirre
Case details for

United States v. Haymond

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES, petitioner, v. Andre Ralph HAYMOND.

Court:Supreme Court of the United States

Date published: Oct 26, 2018

Citations

139 S. Ct. 398 (2018)
202 L. Ed. 2d 309

Citing Cases

Wertenberger v. United States

Movant filed the instant motion to vacate on June 17, 2019. He alleges that pursuant to a 10th Circuit case,…

United States v. Wilson

Pursuant to the mandatory revocation provision of 18 U.S.C. § 3583(g)(2), the district court revoked Wilson’s…