Summary
explicating interplay of Terry standard and collective knowledge doctrine
Summary of this case from United States v. LujanOpinion
CASE NO. 4:14-CR-178
06-09-2015
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ISAAC IVAN HARTFIELD
MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action, this matter having been heretofore referred to the United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. On May 18, 2015, the report of the Magistrate Judge was entered containing proposed findings of fact and recommendations that Defendant's Motion to Suppress Evidence and Statement (#20) be DENIED.
The Court, having made a de novo review of Defendant's objections (#29), is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct, and the objections are without merit. Therefore, the Court hereby adopts the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge as the findings and conclusions of this Court. It is accordingly
ORDERED that Defendant's Motion to Suppress Evidence and Statement (#20) is DENIED.
SIGNED at Beaumont, Texas, this 9th day of June, 2015.
/s/_________
MARCIA A. CRONE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE