From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Hamilton

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Dec 13, 2019
2:18-cv-02011 (ADS) (SIL) (E.D.N.Y. Dec. 13, 2019)

Opinion

2:18-cv-02011 (ADS) (SIL)

12-13-2019

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. JAMELA HAMILTON, Defendants.


MEMORANDUM OF DECISION & ORDER

SPATT, District Judge.

On April 4, 2018, the Plaintiff brought this action to collect a sum of money due and owing the Social Security Administration for an overpayment of disability insurance benefits.

On January 14, 2019, the Clerk of the Court issued a Certificate of Default, pursuant to Rule 55(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

On March 25, 2019, the Plaintiff moved for a default judgment.

On March 28, 2019, the Court referred the motion to United States Magistrate Judge Steven I. Locke for a recommendation as to whether the motion for default judgment should be granted, and if so, what relief, if any, should be awarded.

On November 26, 2019, Judge Locke issued a Report & Recommendation ("R&R") recommending that the Court deny the Plaintiff's motion for failure to comply with Local Rule 55.2(c).

It has been more than fourteen days since the service of the R&R, and the parties have not filed objections.

As such, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72, this Court has reviewed the R&R for clear error, and finding none, now concurs in both its reasoning and its result. See Coburn v. P.N. Fin., No. 13-CV-1006 (ADS) (SIL), 2015 WL 520346, at *1 (E.D.N.Y. Feb. 9, 2015) (reviewing Report and Recommendation without objections for clear error).

Accordingly, the R&R is adopted in its entirety. The Court denies the motion for default judgment without prejudice, and with leave to renew upon curing the deficiencies detailed in the R&R. SO ORDERED.
Dated: Central Islip, New York
December 13, 2019

/s/ Arthur D . Spatt

ARTHUR D. SPATT

United States District Judge


Summaries of

United States v. Hamilton

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Dec 13, 2019
2:18-cv-02011 (ADS) (SIL) (E.D.N.Y. Dec. 13, 2019)
Case details for

United States v. Hamilton

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. JAMELA HAMILTON, Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Dec 13, 2019

Citations

2:18-cv-02011 (ADS) (SIL) (E.D.N.Y. Dec. 13, 2019)

Citing Cases

United States v. John

"[F]ailure to comply with Local [Civil] Rule 55.2(c) warrants denial of the motion for default judgment" and…

Gunthorpes v. The IM. Grp.

In cases in which the plaintiff does not comply with Local Rule 55.2(c) by mailing the motion and supporting…