From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Green

United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit
Nov 20, 2012
492 F. App'x 694 (7th Cir. 2012)

Opinion

No. 11-3354

11-20-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. LARRY WOLLIE GREEN, Defendant-Appellant.


NONPRECEDENTIAL DISPOSITION

To be cited only in accordance with

Fed. R. App. P. 32.1


Before


WILLIAM J. BAUER, Circuit Judge


JOHN DANIEL TINDER, Circuit Judge


DAVID F. HAMILTON, Circuit Judge


Appeal from the United States District

Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin.


No. 11-CR-47


Charles N. Clevert, Jr.,

Chief Judge.


ORDER

Larry Wollie Green pleaded guilty to distributing heroin. See 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), 841(b)(1)(C). In his plea agreement, he waived his right to appeal his conviction or sentence except for claims that (1) the punishment exceeds the statutory maximum, (2) the sentencing court relied on a constitutionally impermissible factor, or (3) his lawyer was ineffective. The district court sentenced Green to ten years' imprisonment. Green filed a notice of appeal, but his appointed counsel believes that the appeal is frivolous and seeks to withdraw. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Green has not responded to his lawyer's submission. See Cir. R. 51(b).

Counsel advises us that Green does not wish to challenge his guilty plea, so counsel's brief properly omits any discussion about the plea colloquy or the voluntariness of the plea. See United States v. Konczak, 683 F.3d 348, 349 (7th Cir. 2012); United States v. Knox, 287 F.3d 667, 670-71 (7th Cir. 2002).

As counsel concludes, Green's broad appeal waiver makes this appeal frivolous. Green's sentence is below the statutory maximum, see 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1), and the district court did not rely on any unconstitutionally impermissible factor when it imposed Green's sentence. Moreover, any claim of ineffective assistance of counsel would more properly be presented on collateral review, where the record could be more fully developed. See Massaro v. United States, 538 U.S. 500, 504-05 (2003); United States v. Harris, 394 F.3d 543, 557-58 (7th Cir. 2005). Because an appeal waiver stands or falls with the guilty plea, United States v. Sakellarion, 649 F.3d 634, 639 (7th Cir. 2011); United States v. Cole, 569 F.3d 774, 776 (7th Cir. 2009), Green's appeal waiver must be enforced.

The motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the appeal is DISMISSED.


Summaries of

United States v. Green

United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit
Nov 20, 2012
492 F. App'x 694 (7th Cir. 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Green

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. LARRY WOLLIE GREEN…

Court:United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit

Date published: Nov 20, 2012

Citations

492 F. App'x 694 (7th Cir. 2012)

Citing Cases

United States v. Shelton

We thus held that "[t]he district court correctly computed [the armed robbery] offense separate from the…

Latham v. United States

In other words, revocations are always counted separately from convictions for new crimes when calculating…