From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Goyette

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Apr 19, 1972
458 F.2d 992 (9th Cir. 1972)

Opinion

No. 71-2972.

March 30, 1972. As Amended on Denial of Rehearing April 19, 1972.

Marie Donohoe, Seattle, Wash., for defendant-appellant.

Stuart J. Pierson, Asst. U.S. Atty., Seattle, Wash., for plaintiff-appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington.

Before HAMLEY, BROWNING and WRIGHT, Circuit Judges.


After a trial to the court, Goyette was convicted of a violation of 7 U.S.C. § 2023 (unlawful acquisition of food stamp coupons). Upon this appeal, he urges that the evidence was insufficient to prove unlawful intent and that the statute is unconstitutionally vague. His contentions are without merit and we affirm.

In determining the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain a finding of criminal intent, we view the evidence in the light most favorable to the government. Glasser v. United States, 315 U.S. 60, 62 S.Ct. 457, 86 L.Ed. 680 (1942); United States v. Nelson, 419 F.2d 1237 (9th Cir. 1969).

Appellant admitted that he purchased the food stamps. He testified that his motive in buying them was to aid law enforcement and to bring the sellers (government agents) to justice.

However, the trier of fact was not obliged to credit the self-serving, and somewhat implausible, testimony of the defendant. The trial judge could instead, as he evidently did, find that Goyette purchased the stamps with criminal intent and then, after later learning that he had dealt with government agents, devised a false story in an attempt to exculpate himself.

Goyette admitted at trial that he knew his purchase was unlawful. His contention that the statute is void for vagueness borders on the frivolous. United States v. Wilson, 438 F.2d 479 (7th Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 402 U.S. 929, 91 S.Ct. 1525, 28 L.Ed.2d 863 (1971). See also United States v. National Dairy Products Corp., 372 U.S. 29, 83 S.Ct. 594, 9 L.Ed.2d 561 (1963), which teaches that a statute will not be ruled void for vagueness when it is sufficient to give the particular defendant notice that his conduct is illegal.

Affirmed. The mandate will issue now.


Summaries of

United States v. Goyette

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Apr 19, 1972
458 F.2d 992 (9th Cir. 1972)
Case details for

United States v. Goyette

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. IVAN RAY GOYETTE…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Apr 19, 1972

Citations

458 F.2d 992 (9th Cir. 1972)

Citing Cases

United States v. Salazar

We agree with the view of other circuits that a vagueness challenge to § 2024(b) in these circumstances is…

United States v. Marvin

Marvin's challenge to the constitutionality of § 2024(b) on vagueness grounds also fails because of our…