From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Gonzalez-Longoria

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Feb 26, 2016
815 F.3d 189 (5th Cir. 2016)

Summary

discussing the application of U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(C), 8 U.S.C. § 1101, and 18 U.S.C. § 16, and finding 18 U.S.C. § 16 to be unconstitutionally vague

Summary of this case from Gomez v. United States

Opinion

No. 15–40041.

02-26-2016

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff–Appellee v. Gregorio GONZALEZ–LONGORIA, Defendant–Appellant.

John Patrick Taddei, Esq., Trial Attorney, U.S. Department of Justice Criminal Division, Washington, DC, Renata Ann Gowie, Asst. U.S. Atty., John A. Reed, Asst. U.S. Atty. (argued), U.S. Attorney's Office, Houston, TX, Plaintiff–Appellee. Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Michael Lance Herman, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Evan Gray Howze, Margaret Christina Ling, Assistant Federal Public Defender (argued), Federal Public Defender's Office, Houston, TX, for Defendant–Appellant.


John Patrick Taddei, Esq., Trial Attorney, U.S. Department of Justice Criminal Division, Washington, DC, Renata Ann Gowie, Asst. U.S. Atty., John A. Reed, Asst. U.S. Atty. (argued), U.S. Attorney's Office, Houston, TX, Plaintiff–Appellee.

Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Michael Lance Herman, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Evan Gray Howze, Margaret Christina Ling, Assistant Federal Public Defender (argued), Federal Public Defender's Office, Houston, TX, for Defendant–Appellant.

Before STEWART, Chief Judge, JOLLY, DAVIS, JONES, SMITH, DENNIS, CLEMENT, PRADO, OWEN, ELROD, SOUTHWICK, HAYNES, GRAVES, HIGGINSON and COSTA, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

A majority of the circuit judges in regular active service and not disqualified having voted in favor, on the Court's own motion, to rehear this case en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.


Summaries of

United States v. Gonzalez-Longoria

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Feb 26, 2016
815 F.3d 189 (5th Cir. 2016)

discussing the application of U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(C), 8 U.S.C. § 1101, and 18 U.S.C. § 16, and finding 18 U.S.C. § 16 to be unconstitutionally vague

Summary of this case from Gomez v. United States

discussing the application of U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(C), 8 U.S.C. § 1101, and 18 U.S.C. § 16, and finding 18 U.S.C. § 16 to be unconstitutionally vague

Summary of this case from Perez-Hernandez v. United States

discussing the application of U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(c), 8 U.S.C. § 1101, and 18 U.S.C. § 16, and finding 18 U.S.C. § 16 to be unconstitutionally vague

Summary of this case from Ambriz-De Leon v. United States

discussing the application of U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(c), 8 U.S.C. § 1101, and 18 U.S.C. § 16, and finding 18 U.S.C. § 16 to be unconstitutionally vague

Summary of this case from Vallin-Nieves v. United States

discussing the application of U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(c), 8 U.S.C. § 1101, and 18 U.S.C. § 16, and finding 18 U.S.C. § 16 to be unconstitutionally vague

Summary of this case from Mora-Patino v. United States

discussing the application of U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(C), 8 U.S.C. § 1101, and 18 U.S.C. § 16, and finding 18 U.S.C. § 16 to be unconstitutionally vague

Summary of this case from Bello-Torres v. United States
Case details for

United States v. Gonzalez-Longoria

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff–Appellee v. Gregorio…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Date published: Feb 26, 2016

Citations

815 F.3d 189 (5th Cir. 2016)

Citing Cases

United States v. Narez-Garcia

In his supplemental brief, he points out that a panel of this court recently held that the statutory…

United States v. Enriques

The judge's role in applying a typical criminal statute to a defendant who commits a crime is to "appl[y] the…