From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Gonzalez

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION
Jul 3, 2017
CASE No. 8:08-cr-288-T-23MAP (M.D. Fla. Jul. 3, 2017)

Opinion

CASE No. 8:08-cr-288-T-23MAP

07-03-2017

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. MODESTO P. GONZALEZ, Defendants.


REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Before the Court is Defendant's motion to appeal in forma pauperis (doc. 212). On April 27, 2017, Plaintiff filed a Notice of Appeal (doc. 209), which challenges the Court's order denying his motion to reconsider the denial of his motion for a minor role reduction in light of Amendment 794 (see docs. 205, 206). Notwithstanding his indigent status, Plaintiff has no absolute right to appeal in forma pauperis. To the contrary, his ability to appeal without prepayment of fees and costs is conditioned by Fed. R. App. P. 24(a)(3), which provides that "[a] party . . . who was determined to be financially unable to obtain an adequate defense in a criminal case, may proceed on appeal in forma pauperis without further authorization, unless: (A) the district court - before or after the notice of appeal is filed - certifies that the appeal is not taken in good faith . . . ." Id.; see also Mellen v. State of Fla., No. 3:13-cv-1233-J-34PDB, 2014 WL 5093885, at *12 (M.D. Fla. Oct. 9, 2014). The court must state in writing its reasons for the certification. Id. A party demonstrates good faith by seeking appellate review of an issue that is not objectively frivolous. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 445 (1962).

Defendant has failed to identify any legal basis for appeal of the Court's order denying his motion for sentence reduction. See Fed. R. App. P. 24(a)(1) (requiring defendants attach an affidavit that "claims an entitlement to redress; and state[] the issues that the [defendant] intends to present on appeal."). And, the Court's order denying the sentence reduction (doc. 205) contains the Court's sound reasoning. Accordingly, this Court concludes that the instant appeal is not taken in good faith. Defendant is therefore ineligible for in forma pauperis status pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 24(a)(3)(A). It is therefore RECOMMENDED:

1. Defendant's Motion for Leave to Proceed on Appeal in Forma Pauperis (doc. 212) be DENIED.

IT IS SO REPORTED at Tampa, Florida on July 3, 2017.

/s/_________

MARK A. PIZZO

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

NOTICE TO PARTIES

A party has fourteen days from this date to file written objections to the Report and Recommendation's factual findings and legal conclusions. A party's failure to file written objections waives that party's right to challenge on appeal any unobjected-to factual finding or legal conclusion the district judge adopts from the Report and Recommendation. See 11th Cir. R. 3-1.


Summaries of

United States v. Gonzalez

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION
Jul 3, 2017
CASE No. 8:08-cr-288-T-23MAP (M.D. Fla. Jul. 3, 2017)
Case details for

United States v. Gonzalez

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. MODESTO P. GONZALEZ, Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION

Date published: Jul 3, 2017

Citations

CASE No. 8:08-cr-288-T-23MAP (M.D. Fla. Jul. 3, 2017)