From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Gadison

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit
Apr 27, 2021
No. 20-2466 (8th Cir. Apr. 27, 2021)

Opinion

No. 20-2466

04-27-2021

United States of America Plaintiff - Appellee v. Deleon Gadison Defendant - Appellant


Appeal from United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa - Central [Unpublished] Before SHEPHERD, GRASZ, and KOBES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM.

Deleon Gadison appeals after the district court denied his motion seeking a sentence reduction under the First Step Act. His counsel has moved for leave to withdraw, and has filed a brief challenging the denial.

The Honorable Stephanie M. Rose, United States District Judge for the Southern District of Iowa. --------

Upon careful review, we conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Gadison a sentence reduction. See United States v. McDonald, 944 F.3d 769, 771 (8th Cir. 2019) (defendant's eligibility for reduced sentence under First Step Act is reviewed de novo, and district court's decision to grant or deny authorized sentence reduction is reviewed for abuse of discretion); United States v. Williams, 943 F.3d 841, 844 (8th Cir. 2019) (sentencing court must have considered the parties' arguments and have a reasoned basis for its decision); see also United States v. Banks, 960 F.3d 982, 984 (8th Cir. 2020) (this court presumes that district court has considered arguments raised by defendant).

Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court and grant counsel permission to withdraw.


Summaries of

United States v. Gadison

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit
Apr 27, 2021
No. 20-2466 (8th Cir. Apr. 27, 2021)
Case details for

United States v. Gadison

Case Details

Full title:United States of America Plaintiff - Appellee v. Deleon Gadison Defendant…

Court:United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit

Date published: Apr 27, 2021

Citations

No. 20-2466 (8th Cir. Apr. 27, 2021)