From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Ford

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jun 6, 1972
461 F.2d 534 (9th Cir. 1972)

Summary

noting attempt to pass counterfeit money, a description of the suspect by a storekeeper, and the key exhibit falling out of the suspect's pocket as supporting probable cause

Summary of this case from Rodis v. City and County

Opinion

No. 71-2788.

June 6, 1972.

Leslie A. Kast, West Covina, Cal., for defendant-appellant.

Stephen V. Wilson, Eric A. Nobles, Asst. U.S. Attys., William D. Keller, U.S. Atty., Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiff-appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California.

Before MERRILL, TRASK, and GOODWIN, Circuit Judges.


In this appeal from a judgment following conviction for violation of 18 U.S.C. § 472 (attempting to negotiate and possession of a counterfeit federal reserve note), the only issue is whether the spurious twenty-dollar bill was, when found by an arresting officer, the fruit of an unlawful search. We hold that it was not.

The defendant was arrested in the vicinity of a store a few minutes after the storekeeper had called the police to give alarm concerning an attempt to negotiate counterfeit money. The defendant matched the storekeeper's description of the would-be negotiator, and a cruising officer stopped him in response to the alarm. The key exhibit fell out of defendant's clothing during a "pat-down" search for weapons. The arrest was based upon probable cause, and the incidental search was lawful.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

United States v. Ford

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jun 6, 1972
461 F.2d 534 (9th Cir. 1972)

noting attempt to pass counterfeit money, a description of the suspect by a storekeeper, and the key exhibit falling out of the suspect's pocket as supporting probable cause

Summary of this case from Rodis v. City and County
Case details for

United States v. Ford

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. BOOKER T. FORD…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Jun 6, 1972

Citations

461 F.2d 534 (9th Cir. 1972)

Citing Cases

Rodis v. San Francisco

Were we to decide that this evidence was not required, Rodis's claim would fail in the first instance.…

Rodis v. City and County

Therefore, the officers were on notice that something more was required. The only Ninth Circuit authority to…