From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Fomichev

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Nov 30, 2018
909 F.3d 1078 (9th Cir. 2018)

Opinion

No. 16-50227

11-30-2018

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Dmitry FOMICHEV, Defendant-Appellant.


ORDER

The government’s motion for an extension of time to file a petition for rehearing, filed on September 27, 2018, is GRANTED .

The opinion filed on August 8, 2018, and appearing at 899 F.3d 766, is amended as follows:

On page nine of the slip opinion, within the first paragraph of the "DISCUSSION" section, replace "The last argument is raised for the first time on appeal, so we do not address it." with "The last argument is raised for the first time on appeal, and we decline to address it." Following that sentence, replace the citation to United States ex rel. Kelly v. Serco, Inc. , 846 F.3d 325, 336 (9th Cir. 2017)with the following citation: United States v. Spilotro , 800 F.2d 959, 963 (9th Cir. 1986).

With this amendment, the panel unanimously votes to deny the government’s petition for panel rehearing, filed on September 27, 2018. No further petitions for en banc or panel rehearing shall be permitted.


Summaries of

United States v. Fomichev

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Nov 30, 2018
909 F.3d 1078 (9th Cir. 2018)
Case details for

United States v. Fomichev

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. DMITRY FOMICHEV…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Nov 30, 2018

Citations

909 F.3d 1078 (9th Cir. 2018)

Citing Cases

United States v. Polequaptewa

Nonetheless, rather than order a new trial, we vacate the denial of the motion to suppress and remand with…

United States v. Helbrans

"Both privileges depend on the existence of a valid marriage, as determined by state law." United States v.…