From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Doucet

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Jun 16, 1972
461 F.2d 1095 (5th Cir. 1972)

Opinion

No. 72-1409. Summary Calendar.

Rule 18, 5 Cir.: see Isbell Enterprises, Inc., v. Citizens Casualty Co. of New York, 5 Cir. 1970, 131 F.2d 409, Part I.

June 16, 1972.

Robert L. Kleinpeter, Baton Rouge, La., for defendant-appellant.

Gerald J. Gallinghouse, U.S. Atty., Robert S. Leake, Asst. U.S. Atty., New Orleans, La., for plaintiff-appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana.

Before JOHN R. BROWN, Chief Judge, and GOLDBERG and MORGAN, Circuit Judges.



The defendant, Louis A. Doucet, was indicted in the Eastern District of Louisiana for knowingly and unlawfully intercepting a wire communication in violation of 18 U.S.C.A. § 2511. The defendant entered a plea of not guilty and then filed a motion to dismiss the two-count indictment. That motion was denied by the district court, and the trial judge ordered that the defendant's criminal trial be held in abeyance pending the defendant's appeal to this court of the trial court's denial of the motion to dismiss. It is established law that the denial of a motion to dismiss an indictment is not an appealable order. See, e. g., United States v. Garber, 2 Cir. 1969, 413 F.2d 284; Snodgrass v. United States, 8 Cir. 1964, 326 F.2d 409; Hoffa v. Gray, 6 Cir. 1963, 323 F.2d 178, cert. denied, 375 U.S. 907, 84 S. Ct. 199, 11 L.Ed.2d 147. Since we know of no provision, statutory or otherwise, authorizing an interlocutory appeal in a criminal case by means of a district court's "certification" of a question of law, we direct that the defendant's appeal be dismissed.

Appeal dismissed.


Summaries of

United States v. Doucet

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Jun 16, 1972
461 F.2d 1095 (5th Cir. 1972)
Case details for

United States v. Doucet

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. LOUIS A. DOUCET…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit

Date published: Jun 16, 1972

Citations

461 F.2d 1095 (5th Cir. 1972)

Citing Cases

United States v. Bailey

If the hazards, expense and inconvenience of retrial are the consequences of the violation of the right, this…

Matter of the Special April 1977 Grand Jury

To be sure, he may raise the issue and renew his request for an evidentiary hearing by post-indictment…