From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Dickson

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit
Feb 9, 2017
No. 16-3059 (8th Cir. Feb. 9, 2017)

Summary

affirming denial of petition for writ of error coram nobis because sex-offender registration under Arkansas statute was collateral consequence of conviction

Summary of this case from Hudson v. Minnesota

Opinion

No. 16-3059

02-09-2017

United States of America Plaintiff - Appellee v. Conrad Eliot Dickson Defendant - Appellant


Appeal from United States District Court for the Western District of Arkansas - Fayetteville [Unpublished] Before WOLLMAN, MURPHY, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM.

Conrad Dickson appeals after the district court denied his petition for a writ of error coram nobis, in which he sought to vacate a prior conviction for which he had served his sentence. His petition asserted an ineffective-assistance claim and other claims that were essentially considered and resolved in a prior 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. Following careful de novo review, we conclude that the district court properly denied Dickson's petition. See United States v. Camacho-Bordes, 94 F.3d 1168, 1173 (8th Cir. 1996) (reviewing de novo district court's legal conclusions in denying coram nobis relief); see also Chaidez v. United States, 133 S.Ct. 1103, 1108 & n.5 (2013) (discussing the contours of the Sixth Amendment right to counsel and labeling sex-offender registration as one of the "collateral consequences" of a conviction); George v. Black, 732 F.2d 108, 110 (8th Cir. 1984) (determining that accused need only be informed of direct consequences of guilty plea); Azzone v. United States, 341 F.2d 417, 418-19 (8th Cir. 1965) (per curiam) (noting that, if sentence has been served, individual may file petition for writ of error coram nobis in attempt to vacate prior conviction, while also holding that a petitioner is not entitled to review of issues that were considered and resolved in a prior § 2255 motion). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

The Honorable Timothy L. Brooks, United States District Judge for the Western District of Arkansas, partially adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Erin L. Setser, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas. --------


Summaries of

United States v. Dickson

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit
Feb 9, 2017
No. 16-3059 (8th Cir. Feb. 9, 2017)

affirming denial of petition for writ of error coram nobis because sex-offender registration under Arkansas statute was collateral consequence of conviction

Summary of this case from Hudson v. Minnesota
Case details for

United States v. Dickson

Case Details

Full title:United States of America Plaintiff - Appellee v. Conrad Eliot Dickson…

Court:United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit

Date published: Feb 9, 2017

Citations

No. 16-3059 (8th Cir. Feb. 9, 2017)

Citing Cases

Hudson v. Minnesota

The Court therefore agrees with Taylor that the registration requirement was a collateral consequence of…