From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Di Donna

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Apr 8, 1960
276 F.2d 956 (2d Cir. 1960)

Opinion

No. 280, Docket 25881.

Argued April 7, 1960.

Decided April 8, 1960.

Anthony R. Palermo, Asst. U.S. Atty., New York City (S. Hazard Gillespie, Jr., U.S. Atty., and Otis Pratt Pearsall, Asst. U.S. Atty., New York City, on the brief), for appellee.

Stephen A. Fuschino, New York City, for defendant-appellant.

Before LUMBARD, Chief Judge, and HINCKS and FRIENDLY, Circuit Judges.


The trial judge properly refused to give the jury any instruction on the subject of entrapment. There was no evidence in the record to support such a defense as the defendant himself testified that he did not know what was in the package which he admittedly delivered to the narcotics agent. United States v. Pagano, 2 Cir., 1953, 207 F.2d 884, 885. The other allegations of error are entirely without merit.

The judgment is affirmed.


Summaries of

United States v. Di Donna

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Apr 8, 1960
276 F.2d 956 (2d Cir. 1960)
Case details for

United States v. Di Donna

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Vincent DI DONNA…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit

Date published: Apr 8, 1960

Citations

276 F.2d 956 (2d Cir. 1960)

Citing Cases

Johnson v. United States

In so far as Crisp and Hester v. United States, 303 F.2d 47 (10th Cir. 1962) may be said to indicate a…

United States v. Swiderski

In United States v. Pagano, 207 F.2d 884, 885 (2 Cir. 1953), we held, in a per curiam opinion, that the trial…