From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Descamps

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Sep 16, 2013
730 F.3d 968 (9th Cir. 2013)

Opinion

No. 08–30013.

2013-09-16

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff–Appellee, v. Matthew Robert DESCAMPS, Defendant–Appellant.

Stephanie A. Van Marter, Assistant U.S., Office of the U.S. Attorney Spokane, WA, for Plaintiff–Appellee. Dan Bruce Johnson, Dan B. Johnson, P.S., Spokane, WA, for Defendant–Appellant.


Stephanie A. Van Marter, Assistant U.S., Office of the U.S. Attorney Spokane, WA, for Plaintiff–Appellee. Dan Bruce Johnson, Dan B. Johnson, P.S., Spokane, WA, for Defendant–Appellant.
On Remand from the United States Supreme Court. D.C. No. CR–05–00104–FVS.
Before: WILLIAM A. FLETCHER, RONALD M. GOULD, and RICHARD C. TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

The original decision entered by this court in this matter, United States v. Descamps, 466 Fed.Appx. 563 (9th Cir.2012) (unpublished), was reversed by the Supreme Court of the United States. See Descamps v. United States, ––– U.S. ––––, 133 S.Ct. 2276, 186 L.Ed.2d 438 (2013). We, in turn, reverse and remand to the district court for further proceedings, consistent with the Supreme Court's opinion.

REVERSED and REMANDED.


Summaries of

United States v. Descamps

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Sep 16, 2013
730 F.3d 968 (9th Cir. 2013)
Case details for

United States v. Descamps

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff–Appellee, v. Matthew Robert DESCAMPS…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Date published: Sep 16, 2013

Citations

730 F.3d 968 (9th Cir. 2013)

Citing Cases

Rose v. United States

To qualify as an armed career criminal under the ACCA, a defendant must violate § 922(g) and have three…