From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Deguirro

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, N.D. California
Oct 2, 1906
152 F. 568 (N.D. Cal. 1906)

Opinion


152 F. 568 (N.D.Cal. 1906) UNITED STATES v. DEGUIRRO et al. United States District Court, N.D. California. October 2, 1906

DE HAVEN, District Judge.

The general reasoning found in the opinion of the Circuit Court of Appeals for this circuit in the case of Dastervignes v. United States, 122 F. 30, 58 C.C.A. 346, has created in my mind such doubt of the correctness of my prior decision in the case of United States v. Peter Camou, filed June 24, 1902 (not reported), that I deem it proper at this time to overrule the motion to defendants for an arrest of judgment; and if dissatisfied with this ruling, the defendants have the right to bring the question involved before the Circuit Court of Appeals for decision.

The motion in arrest of judgment will be denied, and each of the defendants fined in the sum of $20.


Summaries of

United States v. Deguirro

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, N.D. California
Oct 2, 1906
152 F. 568 (N.D. Cal. 1906)
Case details for

United States v. Deguirro

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES v. DEGUIRRO et al.

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, N.D. California

Date published: Oct 2, 1906

Citations

152 F. 568 (N.D. Cal. 1906)

Citing Cases

United States v. Rizzinelli

It is one about which the trial courts are at variance. (United States v. Domingo (C.C.) 152 F. 566; United…

United States v. Grimaud

There the crime was created-- that is, it was defined and the punishment affixed by the statute itself-- and,…