From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Daniel

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Oct 17, 2014
NO. 3:07-CR-142-O (N.D. Tex. Oct. 17, 2014)

Summary

including the impossibility of tracing a particular amount of losses to the defendant and of reasonably predicting the number of future offenders likely to be caught and convicted for crimes contributing to this particular victim's losses in the findings of fact

Summary of this case from United States v. Romero-Medrano

Opinion

NO. 3:07-CR-142-O

10-17-2014

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. TOMMY DALE DANIEL (01)


ORDER ACCEPTING THE FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The United States Magistrate Judge made amended findings, conclusions, and recommendation in this case. No objections were filed. The District Court reviewed the proposed amended findings, conclusions, and recommendation for plain error. Finding none, the Court ACCEPTS the Amended Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge.

SO ORDERED this 17th day of October, 2014.

/s/_________

Reed O'Connor

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Daniel

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Oct 17, 2014
NO. 3:07-CR-142-O (N.D. Tex. Oct. 17, 2014)

including the impossibility of tracing a particular amount of losses to the defendant and of reasonably predicting the number of future offenders likely to be caught and convicted for crimes contributing to this particular victim's losses in the findings of fact

Summary of this case from United States v. Romero-Medrano
Case details for

United States v. Daniel

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. TOMMY DALE DANIEL (01)

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

Date published: Oct 17, 2014

Citations

NO. 3:07-CR-142-O (N.D. Tex. Oct. 17, 2014)

Citing Cases

United States v. Romero-Medrano

See, e.g., United States v. Sainz, 827 F.3d 602, 606 (7th Cir. 2016) ("We do not read Paroline as requiring…

United States v. Monzel

8, 1246 (D. Mont. 2014), vacated and remanded on other grounds , United States v. Grovo , 653 F. App'x 512…