From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Continental Casualty Co.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Feb 13, 1934
69 F.2d 107 (2d Cir. 1934)

Opinion

No. 282.

February 13, 1934.

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of New York.

Action by United States against Continental Casualty Company. From an order striking out affirmative defenses pleaded in the answer, defendant appeals.

Appeal dismissed.

Robert M. McCormick, of New York City (Andrew Eckel, of New York City, of counsel), for appellant.

Howard W. Ameli, U.S. Atty., of Brooklyn, N.Y. (Herbert H. Kellogg and Albert D. Smith, Asst. U.S. Attys., both of Brooklyn, N Y, of counsel), for the United States.

Before MANTON, L. HAND, and SWAN, Circuit Judges.


The appeal is from an interlocutory order from which no appeal lies. Rexford v. Brunswick-Balke-Collender Co., 228 U.S. 339, 33 S. Ct. 515, 57 L. Ed. 864; Cory Bros. Co. v. United States, 47 F.2d 607 (C.C.A. 2); Bush v. Leach, 22 F.2d 296 (C.C.A. 2); Radio Corp. v. Bunnell Co., 298 F. 62 (C.C.A. 2); France Canada S.S. Co. v. French Republic, 285 F. 290 (C.C.A. 2).

Appeal dismissed.


Summaries of

United States v. Continental Casualty Co.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Feb 13, 1934
69 F.2d 107 (2d Cir. 1934)
Case details for

United States v. Continental Casualty Co.

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES v. CONTINENTAL CASUALTY CO

Court:Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit

Date published: Feb 13, 1934

Citations

69 F.2d 107 (2d Cir. 1934)

Citing Cases

Shultz v. Manufacturers Traders Trust Co.

The evident purpose of the appeal is to obtain an opinion upon matters which are not before us. Most of the…

Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. Banion

The trial court, after a hearing, denied the motion, and this appeal is from that ruling. In so far as the…