From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Coal Dealers Ass'n of Cal.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 19, 2019
Case No. 19-mc-80147-JST (N.D. Cal. Jul. 19, 2019)

Opinion

Case No. 19-mc-80147-JST

07-19-2019

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. COAL DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CALIFORNIA, et al., Defendants.


ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Re: ECF No. 1, 3

The Court has reviewed Magistrate Judge Thomas Hixson's report and recommendation to grant the United States' Rule 60(b) motion to terminate legacy antitrust judgments that no longer protect competition. ECF No. 3. The Court finds the report to be correct, well-reasoned, and thorough, and adopts it in every respect.

The Court further notes that Judge Hixson's report was not served on any party. Given that this motion seeks to terminate judgments entered between 120 and 32 years ago and that many of the affected entities no longer exist, the Court finds that the government's public comment initiative provided adequate notice under the circumstances. ECF No. 2 ¶¶ 5-7.

IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: July 19, 2019

/s/_________

JON S. TIGAR

United States District Judge


Summaries of

United States v. Coal Dealers Ass'n of Cal.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 19, 2019
Case No. 19-mc-80147-JST (N.D. Cal. Jul. 19, 2019)
Case details for

United States v. Coal Dealers Ass'n of Cal.

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. COAL DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jul 19, 2019

Citations

Case No. 19-mc-80147-JST (N.D. Cal. Jul. 19, 2019)

Citing Cases

Montague Co. v. Lowry

The Tile, Mantel and Grate Association of California is a combination declared to be illegal by the act of…

Anderson v. United States

In other words, we think that the rules adopted do not contradict the expressed purpose of the preamble, and…