From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Champion

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Feb 19, 2020
No. 19-7330 (4th Cir. Feb. 19, 2020)

Opinion

No. 19-7330

02-19-2020

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. RICHARD ARLEE CHAMPION, Defendant - Appellant.

Richard Arlee Champion, Appellant Pro Se.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Martin K. Reidinger, District Judge. (1:17-cr-00046-MR-WCM-5) Before KING, FLOYD, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges. Vacated and remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion. Richard Arlee Champion, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Richard Arlee Champion appeals the district court's orders denying his motion to compel trial counsel to produce Champion's case file so that Champion may pursue 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2018) relief, and a subsequent order denying reconsideration. We review the denial of a motion to compel under an abuse-of-discretion standard. See Horne v. WTVR, LLC, 893 F.3d 201, 212 (4th Cir. 2018), cert. denied, 139 S. Ct. 823 (2019). Under North Carolina Rules of Professional Conduct 1.16(d), "[u]pon termination of representation, a lawyer shall take steps to the extent reasonably practicable to protect a client's interests, such as . . . surrendering papers and property to which the client is entitled." See also United States v. Basham, 789 F.3d 358, 388 (4th Cir. 2015) (reviewing legal authority requiring counsel to deliver client's file upon termination of representation). Thus, because Champion's former trial counsel should return the case file to Champion, we conclude the court misapprehended the applicable legal principles and abused its discretion in denying Champion's motion to compel.

Accordingly, we vacate the district court's orders and remand with instructions to grant Champion's motion to compel Champion's former trial counsel to send Champion the case file to which he is entitled. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

VACATED AND REMANDED


Summaries of

United States v. Champion

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Feb 19, 2020
No. 19-7330 (4th Cir. Feb. 19, 2020)
Case details for

United States v. Champion

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. RICHARD ARLEE CHAMPION…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Feb 19, 2020

Citations

No. 19-7330 (4th Cir. Feb. 19, 2020)

Citing Cases

United States v. Williams

Under Rule 1.16(d) of the North Carolina Rules of Professional Conduct, “[u]pon termination of…

United States v. Huffman

U.S. v. Basham, 789 F.3d 358, 388 (4th Cir. 2015) (reviewing the legal authority requiring counsel to deliver…