Opinion
22-cr-80022-Cann/Reinhart
08-01-2023
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. DANIEL M. CARVER, THOMAS DOUGHERTY, JOHN PAUL GOSNEY, JR., LOUIS CARVER, and JOSE GOYOS, Defendants.
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
RYON M. MCCABE, U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE
THIS CAUSE comes before the Court on the Government's Motion to Preclude Introduction of Evidence or Argument Related to Defendants' Advice-Of-Counsel Defenses, or in the Alternative, for an Order Directing Defendants to Execute Forthwith Proper Waivers (“Motion”) (DE 589), which was referred to the undersigned by United States District Judge Aileen M. Cannon (DE 618). For the reasons set forth below, the undersigned RECOMMENDS that the Motion be GRANTED in part and DENIED in part.
I. BACKGROUND
This is a healthcare fraud case, set to begin trial on September 25, 2023 (DE 656). On October 14, 2022, the Government moved to compel the disclosure of advice-of-counsel defenses (DE 385). The District Court granted the motion, thereby ordering each Defendant to indicate whether he intends to rely on the advice-of-counsel defense at trial and, if so, (1) to identify the attorneys who purportedly provided such advice, and (2) to waive privilege over all communications with those attorneys (DE 579). Thereafter, on June 5, 2023, Defendants Dougherty and Gosney filed notices, disclosing their intent to rely on advice of counsel from two healthcare compliance attorneys, Robin Sztyndor and Keith Fousek (DE 580, DE 582). As to these two attorneys, Dougherty and Gosney agreed to waive privilege (DE 580, DE 582).
Earlier in the case, however, Dougherty and Gosney had provided privilege logs to the Government, asserting privilege over communications with attorneys other than Sztyndor or Fousek. Specifically, Dougherty had asserted privilege over 90+ communications, and Gosney had asserted privilege over 400+ communications, with healthcare compliance attorneys Aaron Cohen and/or Paul Molle.
On June 9, 2023, the Government filed this Motion, seeking to either (a) preclude Dougherty and Gosney from asserting the advice-of-counsel defense at trial, or (b) compel them to extend their waivers to other attorneys who rendered legal advice on the same subject matter as Attorneys Sztyndor and Fousek (DE 589). The Court heard initial oral argument on this Motion on June 21, 2023 (DE 627). Following argument, the Court ordered the Government's Special Matters Unit (“Filter Team”) to provide the Court, for in camera review, all communications identified as privileged between Defendants Dougherty and/or Gosney, on the one hand, and Attorneys Cohen and/or Molle on the other hand (DE 631).
The Filter Team thereafter provided the Court with numerous documents including “472 unique records identified on privilege logs provided by Defendants Dougherty and Gosney to the Filter Team, listing communications to, from, cc, or bcc Attorneys Aaron Cohen and/or Paul Molle,” and an Excel spreadsheet index of these 472 items (hereafter the “472-Item Index”) (DE 635). The Court conducted an in camera review of all items provided by the Filter Team.
Following review of these items, the Court had additional factual questions, particularly as to the identity and roles played by various limited liability companies and other entities referred to throughout the documents. Accordingly, on July 19, 2023, the Court conducted a status conference to establish a procedure for resolving these factual questions (DE 733). Following the status conference, the Court ordered the Filter Team to provide Defendants Dougherty and Gosney with the 472-Item Index (DE 734). The Court also ordered the Government to provide the Court with information as to its view of the ownership and role played by thirty-one entities referred to on the 472-Item Index (DE 743). The Government complied by providing a spreadsheet with information concerning these entities (hereafter the “Entity Spreadsheet”).
On July 27, 2023, the Court then conducted an on-the-record, ex parte hearing attended only by the Court, Defendants Dougherty and Gosney, and their counsel (DE 752). At this hearing, the Court asked factual questions necessary to resolve the pending Motion and the Court heard, by way of proffer, answers to these questions from defense counsel (DE 752). For record purposes, the Court will file under seal all items considered in connection with the ex parte hearing, including the complete contents of the documents received from the Filter Team as noted in docket entry 635 and the Entity Spreadsheet.
This Order follows.
II. DISCUSSION
The pending Motion requires the Court to resolve three issues:
(a) whether a waiver associated with the advice-of-counsel defense applies solely to the attorneys relied upon, or more broadly to the subject matter of the advice relied upon;
(b) whether the specific communications at issue here fall within the subject matter of the advice relied upon; and
(c) whether the Court should preclude the advice-of-counsel defense at trial.
The Court will address each question in turn.
A. The Subject Matter of the Advice
At the outset, the Court finds that the waiver associated with the advice-of-counsel defense applies to the subject matter of the advice relied upon and not merely to the specific attorney relied upon. “When a party asserts an advice of counsel defense, the party waives the attorney-client privilege as to the subject matter of that advice.” Akowskey v. Nationstar Mortg., LLC, No. 2114487, 2023 WL 112061, at *3 (S.D. Fla. Jan. 5, 2023) (citing Cox v. Adm'r U.S. Steel & Carnegie, 17 F.3d 1386, 1417 (11th Cir. 1994); see also United States v. Jensen, 573 Fed.Appx. 863, 870 (11th Cir. 2014) (“By claiming that [he] lacked intent to defraud because attorneys told him that [the disputed] transactions were legal, [defendant] waived the attorney-client privilege with respect to communications with counsel concerning its legality.”).
As such, a “[d]efendant may not disclose portions of otherwise protected communications between [him] and [his] attorney for the benefit of a defensive argument while simultaneously invoking the attorney-client privilege with respect to other attorney-client communications on the same subject matter.” United States v. Charlemagne, No. 8:15-cr-462, 2016 WL 11678620, at *2 (M.D. Fla. Sept. 2, 2016) (emphasis added). Put another way, “[h]aving opened the door to certain privileged information in an effort to advance [a defense], as a matter of fairness a [defendant] must disclose other privileged materials involving the subject matter of the disclosed communications.” Beneficial Franchise Co., Inc. v. Bank One, N.A., No. 00C2441, 2001 WL 492479, at *4 (N.D. Ill. May 8, 2001).
In this case, Defendants Dougherty and Gosney intend to rely on advice rendered by Attorneys Sztyndor and Fousek (DE 580, DE 582). Based on the hearings conducted on this Motion, the Court understands the subject matter of Sztyndor's and Fousek's legal advice to be Defendants' compliance with healthcare laws, rules, and regulations in the running of the business operations described in the Superseding Indictment. For purposes of this Report and Recommendation, the Court will refer to this topic as the “Subject Matter.”
B. The Documents at Issue
The Court has reviewed all 472 unique documents provided by the Filter Team. Based on this review, the Court reaches the following conclusions as to whether these documents fall within the Subject Matter.
The Filter Team provided more than 472 documents, but many were duplicates, resulting in only 472 “unique” documents (DE 635).
1. Dougherty
Dougherty claimed privilege over 90+ documents, mostly communications with Attorneys Cohen and/or Molle. During the ex parte hearing on July 27, 2023, Dougherty withdrew his claim of privilege over all but fifteen of these logged documents, identified below. Apart from these fifteen documents, Dougherty agrees the remaining logged documents can be turned over to the Government and to any Co-Defendants who have not yet had access to these documents due to privilege claims.
As to the fifteen documents, the Court rules as follows:
Bates
Priv. Log Description
Ruling
88832
11/1/2020 email from Molle re: “Colombian pleads.”
This document falls within the Subject Matter.
88846
10/16/2020 email from Cohen re: “Non Submission OIG”
This document falls within the Subject Matter.
88891 93
10/8/2020 email from Cohen re: “Summary OIG/DOJ 10/7.”
This document falls within the Subject Matter.
88895 97
10/8/2020 Letter Summary from Cohen re: “OIG/DOJ 10/7.”
This document falls within the Subject Matter.
89589
This document falls within the Subject Matter.
89716
8/31/2020 email from Cohen re: “Conclave Invoice/terms?”
This document falls within the Subject Matter.
89718
8/31/2020 email from Cohen re: “LCM bank accts/Olympus.”
This document falls within the Subject Matter.
89738
8/31/2020 email from Cohen re: “LCM change of address.”
This document falls within the Subject Matter.
90862
11/1/2020 email from Molle re: “Colombian pleads 109M.”
This document falls within the Subject Matter.
92838
11/1/2020 email from Molle re: “Colombian pleads 109M.”
This document falls within the Subject Matter.
92909
12/16/2020 email from Cohen re: “Contract w/ Jake-reckless.”
This document falls within the Subject Matter.
92985
11/2/2020 email from Cohen re: “Sober Homes Sentenced.”
This document does not fall within the Subject Matter.
92986
11/1/2020 email from Molle re: Colombian pleads 109M.
This document falls within the Subject Matter.
93000
10/16/2020 email from Cohen re: “Non Submission OIG.”
This document falls within the Subject Matter.
93045 47
10/8/2020 email from Cohen re: “OIG/DOJ Invest. Summary.”
This document falls within the Subject Matter.
Since this document was not identified on the privilege log, the Court assumes it has already been turned over to the Government.
2. Gosney
Gosney claimed privilege over 400+ documents, mostly communications with Attorney Cohen. During the ex parte hearing on July 27, 2023, Gosney withdrew his claim of privilege over all but six of his logged, non-sequestered documents. Apart from these six documents, Gosney agrees that a portion of his logged documents can be turned over to the Government and to any Co-Defendants who have not yet had access to these documents due to privilege claims. See Exhibit A.
At some point in the past, the Filter Team ordered Gosney to sequester a certain portion of documents. Accordingly, since that time, Gosney has not had access to the sequestered documents and therefore has not waived privilege over them. Gosney has provided the Court with a list of the Bates-numbered, non-sequestered documents over which he waives privilege. See Exhibit A.
As to the six documents, the Court rules as follows:
Bates
Priv. Log Description
Ruling
85724 25
2020-09-24 “Email communication between attorney Aaron Cohen and Gosney sent for the purpose of seeking and rendering legal advice.”
This document does not fall within the Subject Matter.
85726 27
2020-09-24 “Email communication between attorney Aaron Cohen and Gosney sent for the purpose of seeking and rendering legal advice.”
This document does not fall within the Subject Matter.
85728 33
2020-09-23 “Email communication between attorney Aaron Cohen and Gosney sent for the purpose of seeking and rendering legal advice; with attachment.”
This document does not fall within the Subject Matter.
57040
2020-10-15 “Email Communication from Aaron Cohen to Gosney attaching a draft Marketing Agreement for Keystone Olympus, drafted in anticipation of litigation and to ensure compliance with
This document falls within the Subject Matter.
various laws and regulations in the health care industry, forwarding a message from Timothy Richardson sent to Aaron Cohen.”
57041 49
2020-10-15 “Draft Marketing Services Agreement between Olympus First Consulting LLC and Metropolis Unlimited LLC, drafted by attorney in anticipation of litigation and to ensure compliance with various laws and regulations in the health care industry.”
This document falls within the Subject Matter.
57554 63
2020-08-28 “Draft Employment Agreement between Olympus First Consulting and John Gosney, drafted by attorneys in anticipation of litigation and for the purpose of ensuring compliance with the various laws and regulations regulating the health care industry.”
This document falls within the Subject Matter.
3. Daniel Carver
The Court notes that Co-Defendant Daniel Carver also received copies of one or more of the above documents. To the extent Daniel Carver, or any other Co-Defendant, claims privilege over any document subject to this Report and Recommendation, the Court finds that such privilege must yield to Dougherty's and Gosney's Sixth Amendment right to present a defense. See United States v. Rainone, 32 F.3d 1203, 1206 (7th Cir. 1994) (“Even the attorney-client privilege, therefore, hallowed as it is, yet not found in the Constitution, might have to yield in a particular case if the right of confrontation, whether in its aspect as the right of cross-examination or in some other aspect, would be violated by enforcing the privilege.”); United States v. W.R. Grace, 439 F.Supp.2d 1125, 1137-45 (D. Mont. 2006) (holding that company's attorney-client privilege must “yield where its invocation is incompatible with a criminal defendants' Sixth Amendment right” to present a defense). To the extent Daniel Carver or any other Co-Defendant wishes to object to this Report and Recommendation, they may do so in accordance with Section III below.
C. Request to Preclude Advice-of-Counsel Defense
Having determined that the above items fall within the Subject Matter, the Court must now determine whether Defendants' failure to waive privilege over these items should result in preclusion of the advice-of-counsel defense at trial. The Government points to case law to support that remedy. See Inmuno Vital, Inc. v. Telemundo Grp., Inc., 203 F.R.D. 561, 564 (S.D. Fla. 2001) (concluding it was “manifestly unfair” for the defendant to raise an advice-of-counsel defense but block plaintiff's attempt to obtain discovery on that legal evidence, and that “this unfairness mandates the exclusion of any evidence about the advice Defendants received from counsel on this issue); SEC v. Wall St. Cap. Funding, LLC, No. 11-20413, 2011 WL 2295561, at *7 (S.D. Fla. June 10, 2011) (“Defendants cannot assert the advice of counsel advice while simultaneously and strategically selecting which communications to disclose for self-serving purposes and which communications to retain as confidential.”).
The Court agrees Defendants cannot simultaneously maintain privilege over the above documents and assert the advice-of-counsel defense at trial. In the Court's view, however, Defendants should be given the option on how to proceed. Accordingly, within the time frame set forth for objections to this Report and Recommendation, Defendants Dougherty and Gosney shall advise the District Court whether they choose Option A or Option B:
Option A: Maintain all current objections and forego the advice-of-counsel defense at trial, or
Option B: Pursue the advice-of-counsel defense at trial, in which case Defendants Dougherty and Gosney shall be deemed to have waived the attorney-client
and work product privileges over all communications and documents with or by any attorneys pertaining to the Subject Matter. This includes all documents the Court has found to fall within the Subject Matter in Section II.B above, which (if Defendants choose Option B) should be produced immediately to the Government and to any Co-Defendants who have not yet had access to these documents due to privilege claims.
III. RECOMMENDATION & NOTICE OF RIGHT TO OBJECT
For the reasons stated above, the undersigned RECOMMENDS that the Motion (DE 589) be GRANTED in part and DENIED in part.
The parties shall have until August 10, 2023, to file written objections with the District Judge, if any, to this Report and Recommendation. The Court has shortened the time frame for objections due to the upcoming trial date. Failure to file objections timely shall bar the parties from a de novo determination by the District Judge of issues covered in the Report and Recommendation and shall bar the parties from attacking on appeal unobjected-to factual and legal conclusions contained in this Report and Recommendation. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); 11th Cir. R. 3-1.
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED in Chambers at West Palm Beach in the Southern District of Florida, this 1st day of August 2023.
EXHIBIT A
i. Documents Contained on the Special Matter's Unit (“SMU”)'s excel over which Mr. Gosney is No Longer Asserting Privilege
1
SMU-PPM-0000053727
2
SMU-PPM-0000053778
3
SMU-PPM-0000053791
4
SMU-PPM-0000054112
32
SMU-PPM-0000057330
35
SMU-PPM-0000057759
36
SMU-PPM-0000057763
37
SMU-PPM-0000057772
38
SMU-PPM-0000057773
39
SMU-PPM-0000057791
40
SMU-PPM-0000057792
41
SMU-PPM-0000057793
46
SMU-PPM-0000060064
47
SMU-PPM-0000060454
48
SMU-PPM-0000061416
49
SMU-PPM-0000061417
50
SMU-PPM-0000061418
51
SMU-PPM-0000061419
52
SMU-PPM-0000061420
53
SMU-PPM-0000061421
54
SMU-PPM-0000061422
55
SMU-PPM-0000061423
56
SMU-PPM-0000061424
57
SMU-PPM-0000061425
58
SMU-PPM-0000061426
59
SMU-PPM-0000061427
60
SMU-PPM-0000061428
61
SMU-PPM-0000061429
62
SMU-PPM-0000061430
63
SMU-PPM-0000061431
64
SMU-PPM-0000061432
65
SMU-PPM-0000061433
66
SMU-PPM-0000061434
67
SMU-PPM-0000061435
68
SMU-PPM-0000061436
69
SMU-PPM-0000061437
70
SMU-PPM-0000061438
71
SMU-PPM-0000061439
72
SMU-PPM-0000061440
73
SMU-PPM-0000061441
74
SMU-PPM-0000061442
75
SMU-PPM-0000061443
76
SMU-PPM-0000061444
77
SMU-PPM-0000061445
78
SMU-PPM-0000061446
79
SMU-PPM-0000061447
80
SMU-PPM-0000061448
81
SMU-PPM-0000061449
82
SMU-PPM-0000061450
83
SMU-PPM-0000061451
84
SMU-PPM-0000061452
85
SMU-PPM-0000061453
86
SMU-PPM-0000061454
87
SMU-PPM-0000061455
88
SMU-PPM-0000061456
89
SMU-PPM-0000061457
90
SMU-PPM-0000061458
91
SMU-PPM-0000061459
92
SMU-PPM-0000061460
93
SMU-PPM-0000061461
94
SMU-PPM-0000061462
95
SMU-PPM-0000061463
96
SMU-PPM-0000061464
97
SMU-PPM-0000061465
98
SMU-PPM-0000061466
99
SMU-PPM-0000061467
100
SMU-PPM-0000061468
101
SMU-PPM-0000061469
102
SMU-PPM-0000061470
103
SMU-PPM-0000061471
104
SMU-PPM-0000061472
105
SMU-PPM-0000061473
106
SMU-PPM-0000061474
107
SMU-PPM-0000061475
108
SMU-PPM-0000061476
109
SMU-PPM-0000061477
110
SMU-PPM-0000061478
111
SMU-PPM-0000061479
112
SMU-PPM-0000061480
113
SMU-PPM-0000061481
114
SMU-PPM-0000061482
115
SMU-PPM-0000061483
116
SMU-PPM-0000061484
117
SMU-PPM-0000061485
118
SMU-PPM-0000061486
119
SMU-PPM-0000061487
120
SMU-PPM-0000061488
121
SMU-PPM-0000061489
122
SMU-PPM-0000061490
123
SMU-PPM-0000061491
124
SMU-PPM-0000061492
125
SMU-PPM-0000061493
126
SMU-PPM-0000061494
127
SMU-PPM-0000061495
128
SMU-PPM-0000061496
129
SMU-PPM-0000061497
130
SMU-PPM-0000061498
131
SMU-PPM-0000061518
132
SMU-PPM-0000061519
133
SMU-PPM-0000061521
165
SMU-PPM-0000063579
167
SMU-PPM-0000065349
168
SMU-PPM-0000065671
These numbers correspond with the numbers in Column A of the excel that is headed by the word “Row.”
These numbers correspond with the numbers in Column B of the excel that is headed by “Bates BEG.”.
ii. Documents Contained on the SMU's excel over which Mr. Gosney is Still Asserting Privilege
10/29 Log
26
SMU-PPM-0000057040
27
SMU-PPM-0000057041
34
SMU-PPM-0000057554
989
SMU-PPM-0000085724
990
SMU-PPM-0000085726
991
SMU-PPM-0000085728
12/31 Log (these documents are duplicates of Rows 989, 990, and 991 above)
151
SMU-PPM- 0000085724
152
SMU-PPM- 0000085726
153
SMU-PPM- 0000085728
iii. Documents Contained on the SMU's excel that Mr. Gosney has Sequestered in Compliance with the Filter Team's Request on November 17, 2022. Mr. Gosney Asserted Privilege over these Documents but is Currently Unable to Access them.
183 SMU-PPM-0000066347 233 SMU-PPM-0000070122 276 SMU-PPM-0000071183 277 SMU-PPM-0000071202 285 SMU-PPM-0000071310 286 SMU-PPM-0000071316 287 SMU-PPM-0000071321 288 SMU-PPM-0000071323 289 SMU-PPM-0000071328 292 SMU-PPM-0000071366 293 SMU-PPM-0000071487 294 SMU-PPM-0000071502 295 SMU-PPM-0000071504 296 SMU-PPM-0000071525 297 SMU-PPM-0000071532 298 SMU-PPM-0000071552 299 SMU-PPM-0000071554 300 SMU-PPM-0000071557 302 SMU-PPM-0000071582 303 SMU-PPM-0000071584 306 SMU-PPM-0000071658 307 SMU-PPM-0000071659 308 SMU-PPM-0000071695 315 SMU-PPM-0000071814 316 SMU-PPM-0000071815 317 SMU-PPM-0000071816 318 SMU-PPM-0000071831 319 SMU-PPM-0000071832 320 SMU-PPM-0000071833 326 SMU-PPM-0000071879 327 SMU-PPM-0000071880 328 SMU-PPM-0000071881 16 329 SMU-PPM-0000071893 331 SMU-PPM-0000071938 332 SMU-PPM-0000071939 333 SMU-PPM-0000071941 334 SMU-PPM-0000071942 335 SMU-PPM-0000071943 336 SMU-PPM-0000071944 338 SMU-PPM-0000071987 342 SMU-PPM-0000072029 344 SMU-PPM-0000072062 345 SMU-PPM-0000072081 346 SMU-PPM-0000072139 347 SMU-PPM-0000072188 349 SMU-PPM-0000072207 350 SMU-PPM-0000072219 353 SMU-PPM-0000072307 354 SMU-PPM-0000072308 355 SMU-PPM-0000072317 357 SMU-PPM-0000072330 358 SMU-PPM-0000072334 359 SMU-PPM-0000072336 360 SMU-PPM-0000072337 362 SMU-PPM-0000072429 363 SMU-PPM-0000072441 365 SMU-PPM-0000072450 366 SMU-PPM-0000072460 368 SMU-PPM-0000072485 370 SMU-PPM-0000072504 372 SMU-PPM-0000072518 373 SMU-PPM-0000072582 374 SMU-PPM-0000072592 375 SMU-PPM-0000072593 376 SMU-PPM-0000072604 377 SMU-PPM-0000072605 379 SMU-PPM-0000072624 380 SMU-PPM-0000072625 381 SMU-PPM-0000072646 17 382 SMU-PPM-0000072647 383 SMU-PPM-0000072648 384 SMU-PPM-0000072649 386 SMU-PPM-0000072651 388 SMU-PPM-0000072664 389 SMU-PPM-0000072665 390 SMU-PPM-0000072684 391 SMU-PPM-0000072700 392 SMU-PPM-0000072702 395 SMU-PPM-0000073010 396 SMU-PPM-0000073045 397 SMU-PPM-0000073046 398 SMU-PPM-0000073047 399 SMU-PPM-0000073050 400 SMU-PPM-0000073051 401 SMU-PPM-0000073052 402 SMU-PPM-0000073072 403 SMU-PPM-0000073106 404 SMU-PPM-0000073109 405 SMU-PPM-0000073115 406 SMU-PPM-0000073121 407 SMU-PPM-0000073124 408 SMU-PPM-0000073125 409 SMU-PPM-0000073127 410 SMU-PPM-0000073138 412 SMU-PPM-0000073157 413 SMU-PPM-0000073185 414 SMU-PPM-0000073188 415 SMU-PPM-0000073190 416 SMU-PPM-0000073191 417 SMU-PPM-0000073192 418 SMU-PPM-0000073205 419 SMU-PPM-0000073271 420 SMU-PPM-0000073305 421 SMU-PPM-0000073317 423 SMU-PPM-0000073324 424 SMU-PPM-0000073329 18 425 SMU-PPM-0000073330 426 SMU-PPM-0000073331 427 SMU-PPM-0000073332 428 SMU-PPM-0000073367 429 SMU-PPM-0000073368 430 SMU-PPM-0000073369 431 SMU-PPM-0000073370 432 SMU-PPM-0000073371 433 SMU-PPM-0000073372 434 SMU-PPM-0000073373 435 SMU-PPM-0000073392 436 SMU-PPM-0000073397 437 SMU-PPM-0000073399 438 SMU-PPM-0000073401 439 SMU-PPM-0000073402 440 SMU-PPM-0000073412 441 SMU-PPM-0000073422 442 SMU-PPM-0000073432 443 SMU-PPM-0000073443 444 SMU-PPM-0000073444 445 SMU-PPM-0000073458 446 SMU-PPM-0000073459 447 SMU-PPM-0000073466 448 SMU-PPM-0000073480 449 SMU-PPM-0000073481 450 SMU-PPM-0000073492 451 SMU-PPM-0000073493 452 SMU-PPM-0000073504 453 SMU-PPM-0000073515 454 SMU-PPM-0000073605 455 SMU-PPM-0000073606 456 SMU-PPM-0000073607 457 SMU-PPM-0000073617 458 SMU-PPM-0000073643 459 SMU-PPM-0000073663 460 SMU-PPM-0000073664 462 SMU-PPM-0000073757 19 463 SMU-PPM-0000073761 464 SMU-PPM-0000073762 465 SMU-PPM-0000073763 466 SMU-PPM-0000073764 467 SMU-PPM-0000073770 468 SMU-PPM-0000073771 469 SMU-PPM-0000073786 470 SMU-PPM-0000073789 471 SMU-PPM-0000073805 472 SMU-PPM-0000073813 473 SMU-PPM-0000073838 474 SMU-PPM-0000073855 475 SMU-PPM-0000073857 476 SMU-PPM-0000073861 477 SMU-PPM-0000073865 478 SMU-PPM-0000073866 479 SMU-PPM-0000073889 480 SMU-PPM-0000073912 481 SMU-PPM-0000073966 482 SMU-PPM-0000073969 483 SMU-PPM-0000073972 486 SMU-PPM-0000073983 487 SMU-PPM-0000073984 488 SMU-PPM-0000073998 489 SMU-PPM-0000074006 490 SMU-PPM-0000074010 491 SMU-PPM-0000074011 492 SMU-PPM-0000074012 493 SMU-PPM-0000074013 494 SMU-PPM-0000074014 495 SMU-PPM-0000074015 496 SMU-PPM-0000074016 497 SMU-PPM-0000074017 498 SMU-PPM-0000074018 499 SMU-PPM-0000074019 500 SMU-PPM-0000074020 501 SMU-PPM-0000074044 20 502 SMU-PPM-0000074047 503 SMU-PPM-0000074048 504 SMU-PPM-0000074049 505 SMU-PPM-0000074050 506 SMU-PPM-0000074051 507 SMU-PPM-0000074052 508 SMU-PPM-0000074057 509 SMU-PPM-0000074058 510 SMU-PPM-0000074059 511 SMU-PPM-0000074061 512 SMU-PPM-0000074062 513 SMU-PPM-0000074063 514 SMU-PPM-0000074064 515 SMU-PPM-0000074067 516 SMU-PPM-0000074069 517 SMU-PPM-0000074070 518 SMU-PPM-0000074071 519 SMU-PPM-0000074072 520 SMU-PPM-0000074073 521 SMU-PPM-0000074077 522 SMU-PPM-0000074078 523 SMU-PPM-0000074079 524 SMU-PPM-0000074080 525 SMU-PPM-0000074081 526 SMU-PPM-0000074082 527 SMU-PPM-0000074083 528 SMU-PPM-0000074084 529 SMU-PPM-0000074085 530 SMU-PPM-0000074086 531 SMU-PPM-0000074088 532 SMU-PPM-0000074089 533 SMU-PPM-0000074090 534 SMU-PPM-0000074091 535 SMU-PPM-0000074103 536 SMU-PPM-0000074104 537 SMU-PPM-0000077972 538 SMU-PPM-0000077979 21 539 SMU-PPM-0000077994 540 SMU-PPM-0000077999 550 SMU-PPM-0000078048 555 SMU-PPM-0000078120 558 SMU-PPM-0000078154 559 SMU-PPM-0000078163 560 SMU-PPM-0000078186 561 SMU-PPM-0000078226 562 SMU-PPM-0000078257 567 SMU-PPM-0000078388 796 SMU-PPM-0000080672 797 SMU-PPM-0000080673 798 SMU-PPM-0000080674 799 SMU-PPM-0000080675 1119 SMU-PPM-0000088729 1120 SMU-PPM-0000088730 1121 SMU-PPM-0000088732 1122 SMU-PPM-0000088738 1123 SMU-PPM-0000088740 1124 SMU-PPM-0000088741 1125 SMU-PPM-0000088743 1126 SMU-PPM-0000088745 1127 SMU-PPM-0000088747 1128 SMU-PPM-0000088749 1129 SMU-PPM-0000088751 1130 SMU-PPM-0000088753 1131 SMU-PPM-0000088755 1132 SMU-PPM-0000088768 1133 SMU-PPM-0000088769 1134 SMU-PPM-0000088781 1135 SMU-PPM-0000088800 1136 SMU-PPM-0000088803 1137 SMU-PPM-0000088805 1138 SMU-PPM-0000088809 1139 SMU-PPM-0000088827 1140 SMU-PPM-0000088831 1141 SMU-PPM-0000088832 22 1142 SMU-PPM-0000088834 1143 SMU-PPM-0000088841 1144 SMU-PPM-0000088844 1145 SMU-PPM-0000088845 1146 SMU-PPM-0000088846 1147 SMU-PPM-0000088847 1148 SMU-PPM-0000088849 1149 SMU-PPM-0000088868 1150 SMU-PPM-0000088889 1151 SMU-PPM-0000088891 1152 SMU-PPM-0000088894 1153 SMU-PPM-0000088898 1154 SMU-PPM-0000088899 1155 SMU-PPM-0000088901 1156 SMU-PPM-0000088902 1205 SMU-PPM-0000090468 1234 SMU-PPM-0000091110 1238 SMU-PPM-0000091165 1240 SMU-PPM-0000091262 1242 SMU-PPM-0000091296 1243 SMU-PPM-0000091297 1244 SMU-PPM-0000091298 1248 SMU-PPM-0000091368 1249 SMU-PPM-0000091369 1250 SMU-PPM-0000091370 1252 SMU-PPM-0000091409 1253 SMU-PPM-0000091410 1254 SMU-PPM-0000091411 1255 SMU-PPM-0000091421 1256 SMU-PPM-0000091434 1257 SMU-PPM-0000091472 1259 SMU-PPM-0000091559 1263 SMU-PPM-0000091775 1265 SMU-PPM-0000091778 1266 SMU-PPM-0000091780 1267 SMU-PPM-0000091815 1268 SMU-PPM-0000091816 23 1269 SMU-PPM-0000091817 1272 SMU-PPM-0000092143 1276 SMU-PPM-0000092225 1277 SMU-PPM-0000092252 1278 SMU-PPM-0000092334 1279 SMU-PPM-0000092383 1284 SMU-PPM-0000092478 1286 SMU-PPM-0000092518 1287 SMU-PPM-0000092519 1288 SMU-PPM-0000092520 1291 SMU-PPM-0000092584 1292 SMU-PPM-0000092589 1293 SMU-PPM-0000092595 1294 SMU-PPM-0000092598 1296 SMU-PPM-0000092603 1298 SMU-PPM-0000092607 1300 SMU-PPM-0000092610 1304 SMU-PPM-0000092634 1308 SMU-PPM-0000092686 1310 SMU-PPM-0000092718 1311 SMU-PPM-0000092719 1313 SMU-PPM-0000092729 1318 SMU-PPM-0000092763 1325 SMU-PPM-0000092819 1326 SMU-PPM-0000092821 1327 SMU-PPM-0000093059