From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Carter

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Oct 3, 2012
11-CR-121A (W.D.N.Y. Oct. 3, 2012)

Opinion

11-CR-121A

10-03-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. RONALD CARTER, Defendant.


ORDER

The above-referenced case was referred to Magistrate Judge H. Kenneth Schroeder, Jr., pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). On March 16, 2012, defendant Ronald Carter filed a motion to suppress. On September 11, 2012, Magistrate Judge Schroeder filed a Report and Recommendation, recommending that deFendant's motion to suppress be denied.

The Court has carefully reviewed the Report and Recommendation, the record in this case, and the pleadings and materials submitted by the parties, and no objections having been timely filed, it is hereby

ORDERED, that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and for the reasons set forth in Magistrate Judge Schroeder's Report and Recommendation, defendant Ronald Carter's motion to suppress is denied.

The case is referred back to Magistrate Judge Schroeder for further proceedings.

SO ORDERED.

______________

HONORABLE RICHARD J. ARCARA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Carter

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Oct 3, 2012
11-CR-121A (W.D.N.Y. Oct. 3, 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Carter

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. RONALD CARTER, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Oct 3, 2012

Citations

11-CR-121A (W.D.N.Y. Oct. 3, 2012)

Citing Cases

United States v. Petix

The Court has discretion to deny a suppression hearing where, among other reasons, "the defendant fails to…

United States v. O'Neill

A court may refuse to hold an evidentiary hearing where the defendant fails to provide factual allegations…