From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Carter

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
Apr 2, 1993
990 F.2d 402 (8th Cir. 1993)

Opinion

No. 92-3122.

Submitted March 31, 1993.

Decided April 2, 1993.

Margaret Price Zoole, Kirkwood, MO, for appellant.

Dorothy L. McMurtry, Asst. U.S. Atty., St. Louis, MO, for appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri.

Before BOWMAN, MAGILL, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.


Edward C. Carter appeals his plea of guilty to forgery of a signature on a U.S. Treasury check in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 510(a)(1). Carter's notice of appeal was filed on September 15, 1992 — more than ninety-two days after entry of judgment on June 15, 1992. See Fed.R. Appellate P. 4(b).

"[T]he timely filing of a notice of appeal is both mandatory and jurisdictional." United States v. Anna, 843 F.2d 1146, 1147 (8th Cir. 1988). We reviewed the district court file, and we found no indication that Carter attempted to establish excusable neglect within the time frame provided by Rule 4(b). We realize that the district court wrote "leave granted" on the notice of appeal on the date it was filed. Nonetheless, in a criminal case, "after the expiration of forty days from the entry of a final judgment there is nothing either the trial court or the court of appeals can do to extend the time for filing notice of appeal." United States v. June, 503 F.2d 442, 443-44 (8th Cir. 1974).

Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.


Summaries of

United States v. Carter

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
Apr 2, 1993
990 F.2d 402 (8th Cir. 1993)
Case details for

United States v. Carter

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLEE, v. EDWARD C. CARTER, APPELLANT

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit

Date published: Apr 2, 1993

Citations

990 F.2d 402 (8th Cir. 1993)

Citing Cases

U.S. v. Thorpe

Accordingly, we dismiss Appeal No. 07-1194 for lack of jurisdiction. See Fed.R.App.P. 4(b)(1) (10-day filing…

United States v. Rocha

And it was filed more than 30 days after the 14-day appeal period expired, meaning that the Court's authority…