From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Carey

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT
Jul 7, 2017
No. 17-7006 (10th Cir. Jul. 7, 2017)

Opinion

No. 17-7006

07-07-2017

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. JASON WAYNE CAREY, Defendant - Appellant.


(D.C. No. 6:16-CR-00025-RAW-1)
(E.D. Okla.) ORDER AND JUDGMENT Before KELLY, MURPHY, and MATHESON, Circuit Judges.

This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. It may be cited, however, for its persuasive value consistent with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1.

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist in the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument. --------

Defendant-Appellant Jason Wayne Carey appeals from the sentence imposed after pleading guilty to being a felon in possession of explosives. 18 U.S.C. §§ 842(i)(1), 844(a)(1). Our jurisdiction arises under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and 18 U.S.C. § 3742(a), and we remand to the district court to vacate the judgment and resentence.

Mr. Carey was sentenced to 60 months' imprisonment and three years' supervised release. 1 R. 42-44. The PSR recommended a guideline range of 37 to 46 months, based in part on Mr. Carey committing the offense "subsequent to sustaining one felony conviction of either a crime of violence or a controlled substance offense." U.S.S.G. § 2K1.3(a)(2); see 3 R. 3-4. The prior violent felony was pointing a weapon at another person in violation of Okla. Stat. tit. 21, § 1289.16. See 3 R. 4. But in United States v. Titties, 852 F.3d 1257, 1275 (10th Cir. 2017), we held that a conviction under this statute does not qualify as a crime of violence under the Armed Career Criminal Act. This definition resembles that found in the sentencing guidelines. The government concedes that this intervening decision controls here. Aplee. Br. at 4. Accordingly, we REMAND to the district court to vacate its judgment and resentence.

Entered for the Court

Paul J. Kelly, Jr.

Circuit Judge


Summaries of

United States v. Carey

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT
Jul 7, 2017
No. 17-7006 (10th Cir. Jul. 7, 2017)
Case details for

United States v. Carey

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. JASON WAYNE CAREY…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Jul 7, 2017

Citations

No. 17-7006 (10th Cir. Jul. 7, 2017)

Citing Cases

United States v. Carey

Thus, we concluded that the district court improperly increased his base offense level, and we remanded to…

United States v. Brown

(#142 at 6). Defendant states this conclusion is confirmed by United States v. Carey, 689 Fed.Appx. 627 (10th…