From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Campos

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Dec 20, 1972
471 F.2d 296 (9th Cir. 1972)

Opinion

No. 72-2050.

December 20, 1972.

J. David Franklin, San Diego, Cal., for defendant-appellant.

Harry D. Steward, U.S.Atty., Stephen G. Nelson, Stephen W. Peterson, Asst. U.S. Attys., San Diego, Cal., for plaintiff-appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California.

Before HUFSTEDLER and TRASK, Circuit Judges, and ANDERSON, District Judge.

Honorable J. Blaine Anderson. United States District Judge for the District of Idaho, sitting by designation.


Victor M. Campos appeals from a judgment of conviction for violation of 21 U.S.C. § 952, 960 and 963, illegal importation of a controlled substance, and for violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), possession of a controlled substance with intent to distribute. We affirm.

On December 15, 1971, appellant's vehicle was referred to secondary inspection at the regular San Clemente checkpoint. When the agent approached the vehicle to ascertain citizenship of the occupants, he detected the odor of marihuana. A subsequent search of the vehicle revealed several concealed kilos of marihuana in the car.

The stop and the brief detention of the vehicle at an authorized immigration vehicle checkpoint were valid without regard to either an articulable basis for suspicion of illegal conduct or probable cause. United States v. Aranda, 457 F.2d 761 (9th Cir. 1972); Fernandez v. United States, 321 F.2d 283 (9th Cir. 1963). When the agent detected the odor of marihuana, he then had probable cause to conduct the search. Fumagalli v. United States, 429 F.2d 1011 (9th Cir. 1970).

Campos argues that an observation of his car by different agents two hours before the checkpoint encounter provided the agents no foundation for a stop or detention. We do not reach the question because, even if he were right, the Government did not need that justification to validate the stop or the brief detention made in this case.

Judgment affirmed.


Summaries of

United States v. Campos

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Dec 20, 1972
471 F.2d 296 (9th Cir. 1972)
Case details for

United States v. Campos

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. VICTOR MANUEL CAMPOS…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Dec 20, 1972

Citations

471 F.2d 296 (9th Cir. 1972)

Citing Cases

United States v. Pagán

In sum, we hold that the search of the van was reasonable and lawful. The result is consistent with the…

United States v. Lovenguth

Morgan had probable cause to conduct the search. United States v. Campos, 471 F.2d 296 (9th Cir. 1972);…