From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Blurton

NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Nov 19, 2015
623 F. App'x 318 (9th Cir. 2015)

Opinion

No. 14-50301

11-19-2015

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. BRIAN BLURTON, Defendant - Appellant.


D.C. No. 5:13-cr-00036-VAP-1 MEMORANDUM Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California
Virginia A. Phillips, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted October 22, 2015 Pasadena, California Before: KOZINSKI, IKUTA and OWENS, Circuit Judges.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. --------

The district court erred by ordering restitution without disaggregating "the losses, including ongoing losses, caused by the original abuse of [each] victim . . . from the losses caused by the ongoing distribution and possession of images of that original abuse, to the extent possible." United States v. Galan, No. 14-30145, slip op. at 9 (9th Cir. Nov. 4, 2015).

The restitution order is VACATED and the case is REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with Galan.


Summaries of

United States v. Blurton

NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Nov 19, 2015
623 F. App'x 318 (9th Cir. 2015)
Case details for

United States v. Blurton

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. BRIAN BLURTON…

Court:NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Nov 19, 2015

Citations

623 F. App'x 318 (9th Cir. 2015)

Citing Cases

United States v. Monzel

The test’s difficulties are seemingly reflected in the large number of district court cases within the Ninth…