From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Berryhill

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
Feb 1, 2018
No. 17-12496 (11th Cir. Feb. 1, 2018)

Opinion

No. 17-12496

02-01-2018

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. HOMER BERRYHILL, Defendant-Appellant.


[DO NOT PUBLISH] Non-Argument Calendar D.C. Docket No. 2:16-cr-00011-LGW-RSB-1 Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Georgia Before WILSON, JORDAN and BLACK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:

Marvin Paul Hicks, III, appointed counsel for Homer Berryhill in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel's assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Berryhill's convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED. Accordingly, we DENY all remaining motions as moot.


Summaries of

United States v. Berryhill

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
Feb 1, 2018
No. 17-12496 (11th Cir. Feb. 1, 2018)
Case details for

United States v. Berryhill

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. HOMER BERRYHILL…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Feb 1, 2018

Citations

No. 17-12496 (11th Cir. Feb. 1, 2018)

Citing Cases

Berryhill v. United States

Mr. Hicks filed an Anders brief with the Eleventh Circuit. The Eleventh Circuit panel agreed with Mr. Hicks'…