From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Bernardo

U.S.
Jan 1, 1836
35 U.S. 306 (1836)

Opinion

JANUARY TERM, 1836.

A grant, by the Spanish government of a tract of land in Florida, confirmed. This court cannot attach any condition to a grant of absolute property in the whole of the land. It was made by the governor, in absolute property, with a promise of a title in form. He was the exclusive judge of the conditions to be imposed on his grant, and of their performance.

This case was presented to the court, by Mr. Butler, attorney-general, for the United States; and by Mr. White, for the appellee.


APPEAL from the superior court for East Florida.


This is an appeal from the decree of the judge of the superior court for the eastern district of Florida, confirming the claim of the appellee to sixteen thousand acres of land; pursuant to the acts of congress for the adjustment of land claims in Florida.

In the court below, the petition was in the form prescribed by law, presenting a proper case for the jurisdiction of the court.

The claim of the petitioner was founded on his application to the governor of East Florida, for a grant of sixteen thousand acres of land, in consideration of his services to the Spanish government; and for erecting machinery for the purpose of sawing timber. The grant was made by the governor, in absolute property, with a promise of a title in form. The date of the grant was the 6th of December, 1814.

It has been suggested by the attorney-general, that though there was no express condition in the grant, one was implied from the consideration being in part the erection of a saw-mill. But we cannot attach any condition to a grant of absolute property in the whole quantity. It was exclusively for the governor to judge of the conditions to be imposed on his grant: he appears to have considered the services of the appellee a sufficient consideration, and made the grant absolute.

The land was surveyed in one tract, at the place called for in the grant, on the 2d of September, 1818. On an inspection of the whole record, we are of opinion that the title of the petitioner to the land surveyed is valid; and therefore affirm the decree of the court below.

This cause came on to be heard on the transcript of the record from the superior court for the district of East Florida, and was argued by counsel; on consideration whereof, it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed by this court, that the decree of the said superior court for the district of East Florida in this cause be, and the same is hereby affirmed.


Summaries of

United States v. Bernardo

U.S.
Jan 1, 1836
35 U.S. 306 (1836)
Case details for

United States v. Bernardo

Case Details

Full title:THE UNITED STATES, APPELLANTS, v. BERNARDO SEGUI, APPELLEE

Court:U.S.

Date published: Jan 1, 1836

Citations

35 U.S. 306 (1836)
9 L. Ed. 435
10 U.S. (Pet.) 306

Citing Cases

Villalobos et al. v. the United States

The building of a mill is not a condition precedent or subsequent. The court cannot annex such a condition to…

United States v. Dalcour

11; Ridgely v. Bond, 18 Md. 433; Filler v. Tyler, 91 Va. 458; Dodge v. Evans, 43 Miss. 570; Bartee v.…