From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Barajas-Bandt

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 6, 2011
CASE NO. 10cr0082-BTM (S.D. Cal. Sep. 6, 2011)

Opinion

CASE NO. 10cr0082-BTM

09-06-2011

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. Barac Barajas-Bandt [1], Defendant.


JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL

IT APPEARING that the defendant is now entitled to be discharged for the reason that:

__ an indictment has been filed in another case against the defendant and the Court has granted the motion of the Government for dismissal of this case, without prejudice; or

X the Court has dismissed the case for unnecessary delay; or the Court has granted the motion of the Government for dismissal; or

__ the Court has granted the motion of the defendant for a judgment of acquittal; or

__ a jury has been waived, and the Court has found the defendant not guilty; or

__ the jury has returned its verdict, finding the defendant not guilty;

X of the offense(s) as charged in the Indictment:

18:115(a) (1) (B) - Threatening to Murder a Federal Judge; 18:876(c) - Mailing Threatening Communications to a Federal Judge

IT IS THEREFORE ADJUDGED that the defendant is hereby discharged.

BARRY TED MOSKOWITZ

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Barajas-Bandt

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 6, 2011
CASE NO. 10cr0082-BTM (S.D. Cal. Sep. 6, 2011)
Case details for

United States v. Barajas-Bandt

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. Barac Barajas-Bandt [1], Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Sep 6, 2011

Citations

CASE NO. 10cr0082-BTM (S.D. Cal. Sep. 6, 2011)

Citing Cases

Driscoll v. Metlife Ins.

This case is distinguishable from this judge's decision in United States v. Barajas-Bandt, 2011 U.S. Dist.…