From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Bams

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUFKIN DIVISION
Jun 11, 2015
NO. 9:14-CR-13(1) (E.D. Tex. Jun. 11, 2015)

Opinion

NO. 9:14-CR-13(1)

06-11-2015

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. HENRY KORVETT BAMS


ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Pending is a motion to suppress evidence (Doc. No. 61) filed by the Defendant, Henry Korvett Bams. The court referred this matter to the Honorable Zack Hawthorn, United States Magistrate Judge for consideration pursuant to applicable laws and orders of this court.

Bams moved to suppress evidence obtained during traffic stops in Nacogdoches County, Texas, and Hot Springs County, Arkansas. Judge Hawthorn concluded that both traffic stops satisfied the constitutional parameters established by the Supreme Court in Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, and recommended that Bams' motion to suppress be denied. (Doc. No. 79.)

Bams filed objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. (Doc. No. 83, 93.) After conducting a de novo review, the court concludes that the magistrate judge's findings, conclusions and analysis are correct. Accordingly, the Defendant's objections are OVERRULED, and the report of the magistrate judge (Doc. No. 79) is ADOPTED. It is further

ORDERED that the Defendant's motion to suppress (Doc. Not. 61) is DENIED.

It is SO ORDERED.

SIGNED this 11th day of June, 2015.

/s/_________

MICHAEL H. SCHNEIDER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Bams

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUFKIN DIVISION
Jun 11, 2015
NO. 9:14-CR-13(1) (E.D. Tex. Jun. 11, 2015)
Case details for

United States v. Bams

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. HENRY KORVETT BAMS

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUFKIN DIVISION

Date published: Jun 11, 2015

Citations

NO. 9:14-CR-13(1) (E.D. Tex. Jun. 11, 2015)