From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Archibald

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
May 16, 1984
756 F.2d 223 (2d Cir. 1984)

Summary

imposing conditions precedent to any requirement of special identification procedures

Summary of this case from U.S. v. Campbell

Opinion

Calendar No. 863, Docket 83-1356.

May 16, 1984.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York.

Before IRVING R. KAUFMAN, OAKES and WINTER, Circuit Judges.


Order On Petition For Rehearing

We wish to make it clear in respect to that portion of our opinion relating to incourt procedures for identification that special procedures are necessary only where (1) identification is a contested issue; (2) the defendant has moved in a timely manner prior to trial for a lineup; and (3) despite that defense request, the witness has not had an opportunity to view a fair out-of-court lineup prior to his trial testimony or ruling on the fairness of the out-of-court lineup has been reserved. Subject to this modification of the opinion, 734 F.2d 938, the petition for rehearing is denied.


Summaries of

United States v. Archibald

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
May 16, 1984
756 F.2d 223 (2d Cir. 1984)

imposing conditions precedent to any requirement of special identification procedures

Summary of this case from U.S. v. Campbell

modifying earlier opinion in the case

Summary of this case from United States v. Sebetich

noting that defendants wishing to take advantage of its ruling must "move in a timely manner prior to trial for a lineup"

Summary of this case from United States v. Morgan

clarifying its earlier opinion, United States v. Archibald, 734 F.2d 938 (2d cir. 1984)

Summary of this case from People v. Monroe
Case details for

United States v. Archibald

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLEE, v. ROBERT ARCHIBALD, APPELLANT

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit

Date published: May 16, 1984

Citations

756 F.2d 223 (2d Cir. 1984)

Citing Cases

State v. Dickson

Unless such a witness is far more introspective than most, and something of a natural-born psychologist, he…

Edwards v. Marshall

The Second Circuit has directly ruled on the issue of in-court identifications, though it was upon direct…