From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Allen

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Apr 7, 1983
703 F.2d 981 (6th Cir. 1983)

Opinion

Nos. 81-5643 to 81-5645.

April 7, 1983.

John S. McLellan, John S. McLellan, III, Kingsport, Tenn., Neal P. Rutledge, Washington, D.C., William R. Willis, Jr., Robert L. Delaney, Alfred Knight, Tyree B. Harris, Dodson, Harris, Robinson Aden, Nashville, Tenn., for defendants-appellants.

Joe B. Brown, U.S. Atty., Aleta Arthur, John Philip Williams, Nashville, Tenn., for plaintiff-appellee.

Appeal from Middle District of Tennessee, Nash. Div., at Nashville, Bailey Brown, Chief Judge.


ORDER

A majority of the Judges of this Court in regular service have voted for rehearing of this case en banc. Sixth Circuit Rule 14 provides as follows:

The effect of the granting of a hearing en banc shall be to vacate the previous opinion and judgment of this Court, to stay the mandate and to restore the case on the docket as a pending appeal.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the previous decision and judgment of this Court, 700 F.2d 298, is vacated, issuance of the mandate is stayed and this case is restored to the docket as a pending appeal. The Clerk will direct the parties concerning the filing of supplemental briefs.


Summaries of

United States v. Allen

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Apr 7, 1983
703 F.2d 981 (6th Cir. 1983)
Case details for

United States v. Allen

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. JAMES M. ALLEN, LEONARD…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit

Date published: Apr 7, 1983

Citations

703 F.2d 981 (6th Cir. 1983)

Citing Cases

U.S. v. Reynolds

Irvin v. Dowd, 366 U.S. 717, 81 S.Ct. 1639, 6 L.Ed.2d 751 (1961); United States v. Garza, 664 F.2d 135 (7th…

United States v. Adamo

First, the prosecutor did not violate an affirmative duty to disclose exculpatory evidence to the grand jury…