From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Ackerman

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Nov 21, 1983
719 F.2d 1282 (5th Cir. 1983)

Opinion

No. 81-1571.

November 21, 1983.

Linda Broocks (Court-appointed), Houston, Tex., for defendant-appellant.

Ronald C.H. Eddins, Asst. U.S. Atty., Fort Worth, Tex., for plaintiff-appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas, Eldon B. Mahon, Judge.

Before BROWN, GOLDBERG and HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judges.


ON SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC [2] (Opinion May 2, 1983, 5 Cir. 1983, 704 F.2d 1344).


Treating the suggestion for rehearing en banc as a petition for panel rehearing, it is ordered that the petition for panel rehearing is DENIED. No member of the panel nor Judge in regular active service of this Court having requested that the Court be polled on rehearing en banc (Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure and Local Rule 35), the suggestion for Rehearing En Banc is DENIED. See United States v. Johnson, 718 F.2d 1317, 1324, n. 20 (5th Cir. 1983) (en banc) (1981).


Summaries of

United States v. Ackerman

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Nov 21, 1983
719 F.2d 1282 (5th Cir. 1983)
Case details for

United States v. Ackerman

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. HERMAN ACKERMAN…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit

Date published: Nov 21, 1983

Citations

719 F.2d 1282 (5th Cir. 1983)

Citing Cases

U.S. v. Tri-State Hospital Supply Corp.

The precedent here at issue stems directly from Rockwell. InRockwell, 10 CIT at 42, 628 F. Supp. at 209-10,…

United States v. Rockwell Intern. Corp.

A question of materiality involves a legal issue to be decided by the Court. See, e.g., Sinclair v. United…