From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States F. G. Co. v. Superior Court

Court of Appeal of California, First District, Division One
Apr 15, 1931
113 Cal.App. 436 (Cal. Ct. App. 1931)

Opinion

Docket No. 7918.

April 15, 1931.

APPLICATION for a Writ of Prohibition to restrain the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco, and James G. Conlan, Judge thereof, from proceeding further with the trial of an action. Writ denied.

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

Horace W.B. Smith and George A. Work for Petitioner.

No appearance for Respondents.


THE COURT.

Petition for writ of prohibition.

[1] Petitioner here seeks to restrain the Superior Court from proceeding further with the trial of the action entitled Dutton Dredge Company, a Corporation, v. United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company, a corporation, wherein it is sought to recover the sum of $2,812.05 for failure on the part of petitioner to keep the employees of said dredge company insured against liability under the Compensation Act. It is here claimed that the question of the liability of petitioner as an insurance carrier was an issue before the commission and its determination upon the question res judicata. The question whether the decision of the Industrial Accident Commission is res judicata is a matter to be pleaded by petitioner in the trial court and to be there determined.

Petition is denied.

A petition for a rehearing of this cause was denied by the District Court of Appeal on May 15, 1931.


Summaries of

United States F. G. Co. v. Superior Court

Court of Appeal of California, First District, Division One
Apr 15, 1931
113 Cal.App. 436 (Cal. Ct. App. 1931)
Case details for

United States F. G. Co. v. Superior Court

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES FIDELITY AND GUARANTY COMPANY (a Corporation), Petitioner…

Court:Court of Appeal of California, First District, Division One

Date published: Apr 15, 1931

Citations

113 Cal.App. 436 (Cal. Ct. App. 1931)
298 P. 63

Citing Cases

Reidy v. Superior Court

This question has been frequently before the appellate courts of this state and has been determined adversely…