Summary
rejecting argument that the inclusion of qualitative criteria on a performance evaluation "demonstrates conclusively [that defendants] did not violate the [PPA]"
Summary of this case from United States ex rel. Munoz v. Computer Sys. Inst., Inc.Opinion
CASE NO. 2:10-CV-02478-MCE-KJN
08-23-2012
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ex rel. DEREK HOGGETT and TAVIS GOOD, Plaintiff, v. UNIVERSITY OF PHOENIX, APOLLO GROUP, INC., and DOES 1 through 100, Inclusive, Defendants.
ORDER EXTENDING DEFENDANTS'
TIME TO ANSWER
Complaint Filed: September 15, 2010
Judge: Honorable Morrison C. England, Jr.
Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, defendants shall answer the Second Amended Complaint in the above-captioned matter on or before August 10, 2012.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
_________________
MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE