From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United Realty Associates v. Davidow

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 10, 1998
253 A.D.2d 462 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

August 10, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Gowan, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

We agree with the Supreme Court's finding that the respondents sufficiently established the parties' respective interests in the partnership and properties at issue (cf., Okun v. Braunstein, 172 A.D.2d 259). Further, the plaintiff failed to submit evidence sufficient to raise a triable issue of fact (see, Zuckerman v. City of New York, 49 N.Y.2d 557).

The plaintiff's remaining contentions are without merit.

Miller, J. P., Pizzuto, Krausman and McGinity, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

United Realty Associates v. Davidow

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 10, 1998
253 A.D.2d 462 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

United Realty Associates v. Davidow

Case Details

Full title:UNITED REALTY ASSOCIATES, LTD., L.P., Appellants, v. SANFORD DAVIDOW et…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Aug 10, 1998

Citations

253 A.D.2d 462 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
675 N.Y.S.2d 324